LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 11, 2009 TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3612 by Otto (Relating to the creation of a pilot program that allows taxpayer appeals from certain appraisal review board determinations in certain counties to be heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.), As Engrossed Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values statewide than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to the state. The bill would add new Subchapter Z to Chapter 2003 of the Government Code, regarding the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). The new subchapter would establish a pilot program allowing property owners to appeal appraisal review board (ARB) determinations for certain properties to SOAH. Funding for the program would come from a $300 filing fee (which must be returned if the appellant wins) and SOAHs right to collect its costs from the losing party. The pilot program would be implemented in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Tarrant, Cameron, and Travis Counties for a three-year period beginning January 1, 2010. Owners of properties appraised at more than $1 million could protest ARB determinations to SOAH, resulting from protests of appraised and market value or unequal appraisal. SOAH and chief appraisers for counties included in the pilot program would submit a report at the end of the pilot program to the Legislature including recommendations for future action. Currently, the only recourse for owners of property appraised at more than $1 million dissatisfied with ARB determinations is to file suit in district court. The pilot program would allow these property owners, with the exception of industrial property or minerals, to protest ARB determinations to SOAH. The property owner or chief appraiser with approval of the appraisal district's board of directors could still file suit in district court after conclusion of the SOAH hearing. SOAH estimates, based on the projected need to hire five additional experienced Administrative Law Judges and three additional support staff, the cost of the additional work would be $884,742 for the first year and $836,761 per year thereafter. These costs would be reimbursable to SOAH through retention of the filing fee when the appellant loses and by billing and collecting its costs from the losing party. Accordingly, the cost to SOAH for performing the work would not have a net fiscal impact on general revenue. According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the fiscal impact of this bill resulting from the pilot program can not be determined. Local Government Impact Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to units of local government. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings LBB Staff: JOB, DB, SD, SJS, MN
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 11, 2009
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3612 by Otto (Relating to the creation of a pilot program that allows taxpayer appeals from certain appraisal review board determinations in certain counties to be heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3612 by Otto (Relating to the creation of a pilot program that allows taxpayer appeals from certain appraisal review board determinations in certain counties to be heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.), As Engrossed
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3612 by Otto (Relating to the creation of a pilot program that allows taxpayer appeals from certain appraisal review board determinations in certain counties to be heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.), As Engrossed
HB3612 by Otto (Relating to the creation of a pilot program that allows taxpayer appeals from certain appraisal review board determinations in certain counties to be heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.), As Engrossed
Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values statewide than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to the state.
Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values statewide than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to the state.
The bill would add new Subchapter Z to Chapter 2003 of the Government Code, regarding the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). The new subchapter would establish a pilot program allowing property owners to appeal appraisal review board (ARB) determinations for certain properties to SOAH. Funding for the program would come from a $300 filing fee (which must be returned if the appellant wins) and SOAHs right to collect its costs from the losing party. The pilot program would be implemented in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Tarrant, Cameron, and Travis Counties for a three-year period beginning January 1, 2010. Owners of properties appraised at more than $1 million could protest ARB determinations to SOAH, resulting from protests of appraised and market value or unequal appraisal. SOAH and chief appraisers for counties included in the pilot program would submit a report at the end of the pilot program to the Legislature including recommendations for future action. Currently, the only recourse for owners of property appraised at more than $1 million dissatisfied with ARB determinations is to file suit in district court. The pilot program would allow these property owners, with the exception of industrial property or minerals, to protest ARB determinations to SOAH. The property owner or chief appraiser with approval of the appraisal district's board of directors could still file suit in district court after conclusion of the SOAH hearing. SOAH estimates, based on the projected need to hire five additional experienced Administrative Law Judges and three additional support staff, the cost of the additional work would be $884,742 for the first year and $836,761 per year thereafter. These costs would be reimbursable to SOAH through retention of the filing fee when the appellant loses and by billing and collecting its costs from the losing party. Accordingly, the cost to SOAH for performing the work would not have a net fiscal impact on general revenue. According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the fiscal impact of this bill resulting from the pilot program can not be determined.
The bill would add new Subchapter Z to Chapter 2003 of the Government Code, regarding the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). The new subchapter would establish a pilot program allowing property owners to appeal appraisal review board (ARB) determinations for certain properties to SOAH. Funding for the program would come from a $300 filing fee (which must be returned if the appellant wins) and SOAHs right to collect its costs from the losing party.
The pilot program would be implemented in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Tarrant, Cameron, and Travis Counties for a three-year period beginning January 1, 2010. Owners of properties appraised at more than $1 million could protest ARB determinations to SOAH, resulting from protests of appraised and market value or unequal appraisal. SOAH and chief appraisers for counties included in the pilot program would submit a report at the end of the pilot program to the Legislature including recommendations for future action.
Currently, the only recourse for owners of property appraised at more than $1 million dissatisfied with ARB determinations is to file suit in district court. The pilot program would allow these property owners, with the exception of industrial property or minerals, to protest ARB determinations to SOAH. The property owner or chief appraiser with approval of the appraisal district's board of directors could still file suit in district court after conclusion of the SOAH hearing.
SOAH estimates, based on the projected need to hire five additional experienced Administrative Law Judges and three additional support staff, the cost of the additional work would be $884,742 for the first year and $836,761 per year thereafter. These costs would be reimbursable to SOAH through retention of the filing fee when the appellant loses and by billing and collecting its costs from the losing party. Accordingly, the cost to SOAH for performing the work would not have a net fiscal impact on general revenue. According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the fiscal impact of this bill resulting from the pilot program can not be determined.
Local Government Impact
Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to units of local government.
Because it is unknown whether the results of the pilot program would result in higher or lower appraised values than under current law, there could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to units of local government.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings
LBB Staff: JOB, DB, SD, SJS, MN
JOB, DB, SD, SJS, MN