LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 26, 2009 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB385 by Ortiz, Jr. (Relating to the prosecution and consequences of certain offenses involving graffiti; providing penalties.), As Introduced The probable impact of implementing the provision of this bill cannot be determined due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to include as contraband any property used by a defendant charged or convicted of a felony graffiti offense to advertise, promote, or publish the commission of that offense. The bill would amend the Penal Code to remove restrictions on paint type as it relates to graffiti offenses. The bill would amend the Penal Code to include arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, and graffiti as punishable as engaging in organized criminal activity. The engaging in organized criminal activity provision increases the punishment of certain offenses to the next higher category. The bill would also amend the Penal Code to repeal the definition of aerosol paint as it relates to graffiti offenses. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2009 and would apply to an offense committed on or after the effective date. Increasing the penalty for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of probation, or, longer terms of confinement in county jails or prison. A check of Texas Department of Criminal Justice records, Department of Public Safety records, Office of Court Administration records, and Jail Standards Commission records did not reveal any information that would help in an accurate assumption regarding the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti; therefore, the probable impact of implementing the bill cannot be determined. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, TMP, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 26, 2009
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB385 by Ortiz, Jr. (Relating to the prosecution and consequences of certain offenses involving graffiti; providing penalties.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB385 by Ortiz, Jr. (Relating to the prosecution and consequences of certain offenses involving graffiti; providing penalties.), As Introduced
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB385 by Ortiz, Jr. (Relating to the prosecution and consequences of certain offenses involving graffiti; providing penalties.), As Introduced
HB385 by Ortiz, Jr. (Relating to the prosecution and consequences of certain offenses involving graffiti; providing penalties.), As Introduced
The probable impact of implementing the provision of this bill cannot be determined due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti.
The probable impact of implementing the provision of this bill cannot be determined due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti.
The probable impact of implementing the provision of this bill cannot be determined due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to include as contraband any property used by a defendant charged or convicted of a felony graffiti offense to advertise, promote, or publish the commission of that offense. The bill would amend the Penal Code to remove restrictions on paint type as it relates to graffiti offenses. The bill would amend the Penal Code to include arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, and graffiti as punishable as engaging in organized criminal activity. The engaging in organized criminal activity provision increases the punishment of certain offenses to the next higher category. The bill would also amend the Penal Code to repeal the definition of aerosol paint as it relates to graffiti offenses. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2009 and would apply to an offense committed on or after the effective date. Increasing the penalty for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of probation, or, longer terms of confinement in county jails or prison. A check of Texas Department of Criminal Justice records, Department of Public Safety records, Office of Court Administration records, and Jail Standards Commission records did not reveal any information that would help in an accurate assumption regarding the probable use of the engaging in organized criminal activity provision for the offenses of arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, or graffiti; therefore, the probable impact of implementing the bill cannot be determined.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to include as contraband any property used by a defendant charged or convicted of a felony graffiti offense to advertise, promote, or publish the commission of that offense. The bill would amend the Penal Code to remove restrictions on paint type as it relates to graffiti offenses. The bill would amend the Penal Code to include arson, criminal mischief, reckless damage or destruction, interference with railroad property, and graffiti as punishable as engaging in organized criminal activity. The engaging in organized criminal activity provision increases the punishment of certain offenses to the next higher category. The bill would also amend the Penal Code to repeal the definition of aerosol paint as it relates to graffiti offenses.
The bill would take effect on September 1, 2009 and would apply to an offense committed on or after the effective date.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, TMP, TP
JOB, ESi, GG, TMP, TP