Texas House Bill HB3859

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/29/09
• Voted on by House: 5/13/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/31/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to a staffing analysis of the Texas Integrated Eligibility Redesign System (TIERS) and benefits eligibility determination processes.

Impact

The implementation of HB3859 is expected to enhance the operational efficiency of the TIERS by establishing clear benchmarks for staffing and functionality. By ensuring that there are sufficient state employees and contractor staff to meet the demands of the system, the bill aims to prevent any potential bottlenecks in processing applications for health and human services. Furthermore, it sets prerequisites for any expansion of the TIERS system, which means that no additional counties can integrate into the TIERS until it is confirmed to be fully functional and compliant with both state and federal standards regarding the accuracy and timeliness of benefits application processing.

Summary

House Bill 3859 focuses on improving the Texas Integrated Eligibility Redesign System (TIERS) and ensuring the effectiveness of the benefits eligibility determination processes. The bill mandates that a comprehensive staffing analysis be conducted to identify both state and contractor staffing needs required for the TIERS system to function optimally. This includes ensuring that all health and human services program benefits are delivered without lapses in service, which is particularly crucial for the vulnerable populations relying on these services.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a necessary step towards optimizing the TIERS, there may be discussions around the adequacy of staffing levels and the timelines for achieving full functionality. Critics might argue about the feasibility of promptly meeting the bill's requirements, particularly the extensive analysis mandated for the staffing needs and the potential delay in expanding services to more counties. Overall, while aiming to improve service delivery, the bill's stipulations can create tension over resource allocation and operational timelines within the health and human services sector.