Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB3910 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 21, 2009      TO: Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3910 by Madden (Relating to the requirements to obtain a license to practice cosmetology.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend various provisions of Subchapter D, Chapter 1602 of the Occupations Code to establish course instruction requirements for an operator or instructor license and to provide for specialty licenses in manicuring and hairdressing. The bill would require the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) to adopt rules to replace the current statutory curriculum and hours requirements for all Cosmetology licenses. The bill would also require TDLR to develop and maintain an exam for the specialty hairdresser license. TDLR indicates that there would be some cost to implement the provisions of the bill, but this analysis assumes that the agency can absorb these costs within its existing budget. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:452 Department of Licensing and Regulation   LBB Staff:  JOB, JRO, ES    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 21, 2009





  TO: Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3910 by Madden (Relating to the requirements to obtain a license to practice cosmetology.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3910 by Madden (Relating to the requirements to obtain a license to practice cosmetology.), As Introduced

 Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures 

 Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3910 by Madden (Relating to the requirements to obtain a license to practice cosmetology.), As Introduced

HB3910 by Madden (Relating to the requirements to obtain a license to practice cosmetology.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend various provisions of Subchapter D, Chapter 1602 of the Occupations Code to establish course instruction requirements for an operator or instructor license and to provide for specialty licenses in manicuring and hairdressing. The bill would require the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) to adopt rules to replace the current statutory curriculum and hours requirements for all Cosmetology licenses. The bill would also require TDLR to develop and maintain an exam for the specialty hairdresser license. TDLR indicates that there would be some cost to implement the provisions of the bill, but this analysis assumes that the agency can absorb these costs within its existing budget.

The bill would amend various provisions of Subchapter D, Chapter 1602 of the Occupations Code to establish course instruction requirements for an operator or instructor license and to provide for specialty licenses in manicuring and hairdressing. The bill would require the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) to adopt rules to replace the current statutory curriculum and hours requirements for all Cosmetology licenses. The bill would also require TDLR to develop and maintain an exam for the specialty hairdresser license.

TDLR indicates that there would be some cost to implement the provisions of the bill, but this analysis assumes that the agency can absorb these costs within its existing budget.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 452 Department of Licensing and Regulation

452 Department of Licensing and Regulation

LBB Staff: JOB, JRO, ES

 JOB, JRO, ES