Texas House Bill HB4785

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/4/09
• Voted on by House: 5/17/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/23/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/30/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the powers and financing of the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District.

Impact

With the passage of HB 4785, the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District gains more authority to manage water resources effectively. The bill allows the district to impose specific fees related to groundwater production and export, thereby providing a financial mechanism to support its conservation efforts. This can lead to more sustainable water use practices in the district, reflecting a proactive legislative response to growing concerns about water scarcity and management in Texas. However, it also raises questions about the balance between regulatory authority and local governance.

Summary

House Bill 4785 aims to amend the powers and financing structures of the Brazoria County Groundwater Conservation District. The bill focuses on adjusting the election schedule for directors of the district and specifies the types of fees that can be levied for groundwater production and export. This legislative change is particularly significant as it directly impacts water management practices in an area where groundwater resources are critical for both community and industrial use. By defining these powers, the bill also seeks to enhance the conservation efforts within the region.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 4785 is the extent of the board's authority in terms of fee imposition and management practices. Critics may argue that increasing regulatory powers could potentially lead to higher costs for residents and local businesses that rely on groundwater. Furthermore, there may be concerns regarding transparency and the district's accountability in how it manages the collected fees. Opponents may advocate for alternatives that give more local control over operational decisions, emphasizing the need for community involvement in water management policies.