Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB765 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 22, 2009      TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB765 by Hartnett (Relating to supplemental payments made to certain statutory probate court judges.), As Engrossed    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code to require a county commissioners court to pay a judge of a statutory probate court who has served in that capacity or as a statutory county court judge since August 31, 1995, an additional amount equal to the amount of benefit replacement pay a district judge is entitled to receive from the state for equivalent continuous service. The commissioners court would also be required to pay longevity pay monthly to a statutory probate court judge who has served in that capacity or as a statutory county court judge for at least 16 years an amount equal to the amount of longevity pay a district judge is entitle to receive from the state for equivalent years of service. The longevity pay would be in addition to the judge's monthly salary. Local Government Impact The fiscal impact to counties would vary depending on the number of judges to which the provisions of the bill would apply. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, MN, TP, DB    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 22, 2009





  TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB765 by Hartnett (Relating to supplemental payments made to certain statutory probate court judges.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB765 by Hartnett (Relating to supplemental payments made to certain statutory probate court judges.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB765 by Hartnett (Relating to supplemental payments made to certain statutory probate court judges.), As Engrossed

HB765 by Hartnett (Relating to supplemental payments made to certain statutory probate court judges.), As Engrossed



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code to require a county commissioners court to pay a judge of a statutory probate court who has served in that capacity or as a statutory county court judge since August 31, 1995, an additional amount equal to the amount of benefit replacement pay a district judge is entitled to receive from the state for equivalent continuous service. The commissioners court would also be required to pay longevity pay monthly to a statutory probate court judge who has served in that capacity or as a statutory county court judge for at least 16 years an amount equal to the amount of longevity pay a district judge is entitle to receive from the state for equivalent years of service. The longevity pay would be in addition to the judge's monthly salary.

Local Government Impact

The fiscal impact to counties would vary depending on the number of judges to which the provisions of the bill would apply. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, MN, TP, DB

 JOB, MN, TP, DB