Texas House Bill HB905

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to procedures for management of certain public school campuses and school districts identified as academically unacceptable.

Impact

The impact of HB 905 on state laws includes substantial changes in how underperforming school districts are managed. By mandating regular reviews and reporting by appointed personnel, the bill seeks to enhance accountability in schools that fail to meet academic standards. It provides a structured approach for addressing concerns in these districts, potentially leading to improved educational outcomes. With the implementation of this bill, the state aims to create a more systematic oversight mechanism, ensuring that schools and their management teams remain focused on improving student achievement.

Summary

House Bill 905 addresses the management procedures for public school campuses and districts identified as academically unacceptable. The bill amends the Education Code by outlining specific roles and responsibilities for conservators, management teams, and monitors appointed to these struggling districts. It specifies that the commissioner of education must review the appointment of these management entities regularly and remove them if they are no longer necessary for effective governance or instructional services. This process intends to ensure that struggling districts receive timely oversight and intervention when needed.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 905 include the balance of empowerment versus accountability in school governance. Proponents argue that consistent monitoring will lead to updates in management practices that could address the academic deficiencies effectively. However, critics may raise concerns about the potential for overreach by state authorities interfering with local governance. Some stakeholders worry that removing local control could hinder innovative solutions that local districts could bring in addressing their specific challenges. Discussions also revolve around the adequacy of resources provided to these districts to implement necessary improvements.