Texas House Bill HJR33

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 12/11/08

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the house of representatives to provide for the removal of the speaker.

Impact

If passed, HJR33 would lead to significant changes in the procedural operations within the Texas House of Representatives. Specifically, it would empower the House to exert greater control over its leadership by facilitating a process through which the Speaker can be removed. Advocates argue that this amendment is necessary for maintaining transparency and accountability in leadership, as it allows for consequences in the event of misconduct or failure to fulfill the Speaker's duties effectively.

Summary

HJR33 is a proposed joint resolution suggesting a constitutional amendment concerning the process for the removal of the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. Specifically, the bill aims to amend Section 9(b), Article III of the Texas Constitution, allowing the House to establish rules for the removal of the Speaker by a two-thirds vote of the elected members. This resolution is intended to enhance the legislative authority of the House by providing a clear mechanism for accountability concerning the Speaker's role and performance.

Election

The proposed constitutional amendment will be submitted to voters for approval during the election scheduled for November 3, 2009. This aspect adds another layer of significance, as public opinion could play a critical role in the resolution of the Speaker's authority, and implications of the amendment could resonate beyond the legislature into broader public discourse regarding governance in Texas.

Contention

Discussion around HJR33 may exert tension among legislators regarding the balance of power within the House. Critics might express concerns about the potential for this amendment to create instability in leadership, suggesting that the power to remove a Speaker could be used politically against a leader who holds a majority position. Additionally, there may be discussions about whether a two-thirds majority is an appropriate threshold for such a significant action, as it could signify a push towards partisan maneuvering.