81R8853 KCR-D
By: Shapiro S.B. No. 1061
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain
criminal history.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 60, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended by adding Article 60.10 to read as follows:
Art. 60.10. DATA REPORTING IMPROVEMENT PLAN. (a) In this
article, "disposition completeness percentage" has the meaning
assigned by Article 60.21(c).
(b) This article applies only to a county that has an
average disposition completeness percentage, including both
juvenile and adult dispositions, of less than 90 percent, as
reflected in the first report the Department of Public Safety
submits under Article 60.21(b)(2) on or after January 1, 2009.
(c) The commissioners court of a county described by
Subsection (b) shall establish a local data advisory board as
described by Article 60.09 not later than November 1, 2009. A local
data advisory board established under this article may include any
person described by Article 60.09(b) and must include:
(1) the sheriff of the county, or the sheriff's
designee;
(2) an attorney who represents the state in the
district courts of the county;
(3) an attorney who represents the state in the county
courts of the county;
(4) the clerk for the district courts of the county, or
the clerk's designee;
(5) the clerk for the county courts of the county, or
the clerk's designee;
(6) the police chief of the municipality with the
greatest population located in the county, or the chief's designee;
(7) a representative of the county's automated data
processing services, if the county performs those services; and
(8) a representative of an entity with whom the county
contracts for automated data processing services, if the county
contracts for those services.
(d) In addition to the duties described by Article 60.09(a),
a local data advisory board established under this article must
prepare a data reporting improvement plan. The data reporting
improvement plan must:
(1) describe the manner in which the county intends to
improve the county's disposition completeness percentage;
(2) ensure that the county takes the steps necessary
for the county's average disposition completeness percentage to be
equal to or greater than 90 percent in the first report the
Department of Public Safety submits under Article 60.21(b)(2) on or
after January 1, 2013; and
(3) include a comprehensive strategy by which the
county will permanently maintain the county's disposition
completeness percentage at or above 90 percent.
(e) Not later than June 1, 2010, a local data advisory board
established under this article shall submit to the Department of
Public Safety the data reporting improvement plan prepared for the
county. On receipt of a data reporting improvement plan under this
article, the department shall post the plan on the Internet website
maintained by the department.
(f) The public safety director of the Department of Public
Safety may adopt rules concerning the contents and form of a data
reporting improvement plan prepared under this article.
(g) This article expires September 1, 2013.
SECTION 2. Article 60.21, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (c) to
read as follows:
(b) The Department of Public Safety shall:
(1) monitor the submission of arrest and disposition
information by local jurisdictions;
(2) annually submit to the Legislative Budget Board,
the governor, the state auditor, and the standing committees in the
senate and house of representatives that have primary jurisdiction
over criminal justice and the Department of Public Safety [council]
a report regarding the level of reporting by local jurisdictions;
(3) identify local jurisdictions that do not report
arrest or disposition information or that partially report
information; and
(4) for use in determining the status of outstanding
dispositions, publish monthly on the Department of Public Safety's
Internet website or on another electronic publication a report
listing each arrest by local jurisdiction for which there is no
corresponding final court disposition.
(c) The report described by Subsection (b)(2) must contain a
disposition completeness percentage for each county in this state.
For purposes of this subsection, "disposition completeness
percentage" means the percentage of arrest charges a county reports
to the Department of Public Safety to be entered in the computerized
criminal history system under this chapter that were brought
against a person in the county for which a disposition has been
subsequently reported and entered into the computerized criminal
history system.
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.