Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1061 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 11, 2009      TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1061 by Shapiro (Relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain criminal history.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require that counties with an average disposition completeness percentage of less than 90 percent implement a data reporting improvement plan. Under the plan, counties would be required to establish a local data advisory board by November 1, 2009. The board would be required to prepare a data reporting improvement plan that describes the steps the county will take to improve its disposition completeness percentage and include a comprehensive strategy by which the county will permanently maintain an average disposition completeness percentage equal to or greater than 90 percent. The county must submit the plan to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) by June 1, 2010. DPS would be required to post the counties' data reporting improvement plans on its website and annually submit a report that includes each county's disposition completeness percentage to the Legislative Budget Board, the governor, the lieutenant governor, the state auditor, and the standing committees in the legislature that have primary jurisdiction over criminal justice and DPS. DPS and the State Auditor's Office indicate that implementing the provisions of the bill would not pose a significant fiscal impact to their resources or operations. Local Government Impact According to information provided by the Texas Association of Counties, the provisions of the bill would have a significant fiscal impact to counties that do not attain the required 90 percent disposition completeness rate. The association reported that the Texas Computerized Criminal History System report for 2009 shows there are only 38 counties reporting a 90 percent or better disposition completeness rate for adult cases. Therefore, 216 counties are below the rate. The association anticipates that those counties would have to hire additional staff and that time spent meeting, studying, and preparing the plan would be considerable.    Source Agencies:308 State Auditor's Office, 405 Department of Public Safety   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, DB, MWU    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 11, 2009





  TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1061 by Shapiro (Relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain criminal history.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1061 by Shapiro (Relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain criminal history.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1061 by Shapiro (Relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain criminal history.), As Engrossed

SB1061 by Shapiro (Relating to improving the accuracy of reporting concerning certain criminal history.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require that counties with an average disposition completeness percentage of less than 90 percent implement a data reporting improvement plan. Under the plan, counties would be required to establish a local data advisory board by November 1, 2009. The board would be required to prepare a data reporting improvement plan that describes the steps the county will take to improve its disposition completeness percentage and include a comprehensive strategy by which the county will permanently maintain an average disposition completeness percentage equal to or greater than 90 percent. The county must submit the plan to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) by June 1, 2010. DPS would be required to post the counties' data reporting improvement plans on its website and annually submit a report that includes each county's disposition completeness percentage to the Legislative Budget Board, the governor, the lieutenant governor, the state auditor, and the standing committees in the legislature that have primary jurisdiction over criminal justice and DPS. DPS and the State Auditor's Office indicate that implementing the provisions of the bill would not pose a significant fiscal impact to their resources or operations.

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require that counties with an average disposition completeness percentage of less than 90 percent implement a data reporting improvement plan. Under the plan, counties would be required to establish a local data advisory board by November 1, 2009. The board would be required to prepare a data reporting improvement plan that describes the steps the county will take to improve its disposition completeness percentage and include a comprehensive strategy by which the county will permanently maintain an average disposition completeness percentage equal to or greater than 90 percent. The county must submit the plan to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) by June 1, 2010.

DPS would be required to post the counties' data reporting improvement plans on its website and annually submit a report that includes each county's disposition completeness percentage to the Legislative Budget Board, the governor, the lieutenant governor, the state auditor, and the standing committees in the legislature that have primary jurisdiction over criminal justice and DPS.

DPS and the State Auditor's Office indicate that implementing the provisions of the bill would not pose a significant fiscal impact to their resources or operations.

Local Government Impact

According to information provided by the Texas Association of Counties, the provisions of the bill would have a significant fiscal impact to counties that do not attain the required 90 percent disposition completeness rate. The association reported that the Texas Computerized Criminal History System report for 2009 shows there are only 38 counties reporting a 90 percent or better disposition completeness rate for adult cases. Therefore, 216 counties are below the rate. The association anticipates that those counties would have to hire additional staff and that time spent meeting, studying, and preparing the plan would be considerable.

Source Agencies: 308 State Auditor's Office, 405 Department of Public Safety

308 State Auditor's Office, 405 Department of Public Safety

LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, DB, MWU

 JOB, ESi, DB, MWU