Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1168 Senate Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 14, 2009      TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1168 by Hinojosa (Relating to a rescission period for annuity contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend Insurance Code to require a rescission period for annuity contracts. Based on the analysis of the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), it is assumed that there would be a one-time revenue gain of $32,400 in the General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 in fiscal year 2010 because the bill would result in additional filings. Since General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 is a self-leveling account, this analysis assumes all revenue generated would go toward fund balances or the maintenance tax would be set to recover a lower level of revenue the following year. It is also assumed that any costs realized by TDI from implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing resources. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:454 Department of Insurance   LBB Staff:  JOB, CH, KJG    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 14, 2009





  TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1168 by Hinojosa (Relating to a rescission period for annuity contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1168 by Hinojosa (Relating to a rescission period for annuity contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1168 by Hinojosa (Relating to a rescission period for annuity contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

SB1168 by Hinojosa (Relating to a rescission period for annuity contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend Insurance Code to require a rescission period for annuity contracts. Based on the analysis of the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), it is assumed that there would be a one-time revenue gain of $32,400 in the General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 in fiscal year 2010 because the bill would result in additional filings. Since General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 is a self-leveling account, this analysis assumes all revenue generated would go toward fund balances or the maintenance tax would be set to recover a lower level of revenue the following year. It is also assumed that any costs realized by TDI from implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.

The bill would amend Insurance Code to require a rescission period for annuity contracts.

Based on the analysis of the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), it is assumed that there would be a one-time revenue gain of $32,400 in the General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 in fiscal year 2010 because the bill would result in additional filings. Since General Revenue Dedicated Account Fund 36 is a self-leveling account, this analysis assumes all revenue generated would go toward fund balances or the maintenance tax would be set to recover a lower level of revenue the following year. It is also assumed that any costs realized by TDI from implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 454 Department of Insurance

454 Department of Insurance

LBB Staff: JOB, CH, KJG

 JOB, CH, KJG