Texas Senate Bill SB1322

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the exchange of information among certain governmental entities concerning at-risk youth.

Impact

The proposed law impacts existing statutes regarding how governmental agencies can cooperate and share information about minors facing potential delinquency or educational challenges. Particularly, SB1322 emphasizes the need to confidentially exchange personally identifiable information among specific agencies such as the Texas Youth Commission, the Department of Family and Protective Services, and local school districts. This initiative is expected to improve the identification and support of at-risk youth by allowing agencies to react swiftly and effectively to their needs, thereby enhancing the likelihood of successful interventions.

Summary

SB1322 aims to facilitate the exchange of information among various governmental entities concerning at-risk youth in Texas. The bill intends to amend the Family Code, particularly focusing on enhancing the capabilities of agencies tasked with the care, protection, and intervention for youths who are identified as being at-risk. This is in response to the increasing need for coordinated efforts among agencies that handle juvenile matters, education, health, and various forms of social services. By allowing these agencies to share confidential information, the bill promotes a comprehensive approach to supporting at-risk youth through better resource allocation and targeted interventions.

Contention

Although the bill is designed to strengthen the coordination of services for at-risk youth, concerns have been raised regarding the privacy of the individuals involved. Critics may argue that increased information sharing could lead to potential breaches of confidentiality, particularly with sensitive data regarding minors. Moreover, questions regarding the clarity and fairness of how information is shared between agencies, and what specific protocols need to be established, are central to ongoing discussions. Ensuring a balance between effective intervention and the safeguarding of personal information remains a critical point of debate surrounding SB1322.