Texas Senate Bill SB1410

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/1/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/11/09
• Voted on by House: 5/20/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/29/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the licensing and regulation of plumbers and multipurpose residential fire protection sprinkler specialists; prohibiting municipal regulations requiring the installation of fire protection sprinkler systems in certain residences.

Impact

The impact of SB1410 on state laws is significant, as it not only guides the licensing processes for plumbers and sprinkler specialists but also limits local governments' power to impose additional safety measures. The revision of definitions adds clarity and specificity to occupational roles, which may enhance professional standards in the industry. However, the bill also raises concerns about public safety, as many municipal regulations regarding fire protection are aimed at protecting residents, especially in high-density housing units where the risk of fire can be greater.

Summary

Senate Bill 1410 aims to enhance the licensing and regulation framework for plumbers and multipurpose residential fire protection sprinkler specialists in Texas. The bill introduces modifications to various definitions within the Occupations Code, particularly enhancing the roles and responsibilities of licensed plumbers and inspectors. A central aspect of the bill is to prohibit municipalities from enforcing regulations that require the installation of fire protection sprinkler systems in certain residential structures, thereby centralizing authority and standardizing plumbing regulations at the state level.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1410 include the debate over local control versus state authority. Proponents of the bill argue that it simplifies the licensing requirements and eliminates unnecessary municipal regulations that may hinder the plumbing profession. In contrast, opponents express concerns that the bill may endanger public safety by disallowing city governments from implementing tailored fire safety measures that address unique community needs. This ongoing debate reflects broader tensions in governance relating to local versus state powers, particularly in areas involving public health and safety.