Texas Senate Bill SB1506

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/20/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/5/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/11/09
• Voted on by House: 5/14/09
• Governor Action: 5/26/09
• Enrolled: 5/15/09
• Passed: 5/26/09

Caption

Relating to the payment of the costs associated with certain conditions of bond.

Impact

The implications of SB1506 extend to defendants placed under electronic monitoring or ordered to undergo substance testing. By allowing the costs incurred for these services to be regarded as court costs or as direct financial obligations for the defendant, the bill clarifies the financial responsibilities that individuals face when subjected to such conditions. This change is expected to streamline processes in court proceedings regarding bond management, thus potentially increasing accountability for defendants. However, it also raises considerations about the financial burden placed on individuals who may be facing criminal charges.

Summary

Senate Bill 1506 amends Article 17.44 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically focusing on the financial responsibilities associated with certain conditions of bond. The primary goal of this legislation is to stipulate that costs for electronic monitoring and drug testing may be assessed either as court costs or directly ordered to be paid by the defendant as a condition of bond. This amendment aims to provide magistrates with clearer authority regarding the financial aspects of bond conditions that can be applied to defendants, enhancing the enforcement framework surrounding bond compliance.

Contention

While SB1506 aims to enhance the clarity and authority surrounding bond conditions, there may be points of contention regarding the financial implications for defendants. Critics of the bill may argue that imposing additional costs can disproportionately affect low-income individuals, potentially leading to a cycle of disadvantage where inability to pay results in increased legal penalties or incarceration. Advocates maintain that by making defendants responsible for these costs, the legislation encourages compliance with bond conditions, ultimately aiding in the judicial process.