LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 2, 2009 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1681 by Hinojosa (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony to support a criminal conviction.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure by prohibiting the conviction of a criminal defendant on the testimony of a person to whom the defendant made a statement against the defendant's interest during a time when the person was imprisoned or confined in the same correctional facility as the defendant, unless the testimony is corroborated. The Office of Court Administration states that the bill would not have any effect on the workload of the court system. Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 2, 2009
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1681 by Hinojosa (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony to support a criminal conviction.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1681 by Hinojosa (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony to support a criminal conviction.), As Engrossed
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1681 by Hinojosa (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony to support a criminal conviction.), As Engrossed
SB1681 by Hinojosa (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony to support a criminal conviction.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure by prohibiting the conviction of a criminal defendant on the testimony of a person to whom the defendant made a statement against the defendant's interest during a time when the person was imprisoned or confined in the same correctional facility as the defendant, unless the testimony is corroborated. The Office of Court Administration states that the bill would not have any effect on the workload of the court system. Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure by prohibiting the conviction of a criminal defendant on the testimony of a person to whom the defendant made a statement against the defendant's interest during a time when the person was imprisoned or confined in the same correctional facility as the defendant, unless the testimony is corroborated. The Office of Court Administration states that the bill would not have any effect on the workload of the court system. Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG
JOB, ESi, GG