Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1714 Senate Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 30, 2009      TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1714 by Hegar (Relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater conservation district in accordance with its management plan.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would clarify the definition of beneficial use and provide evidential standards. The bill would require a groundwater conservation district (GCD) management plan consider and address the state water plan groundwater strategies that project reliance on groundwater resources in the GCD. The bill would clarify that a regional water planning group with an adopted state water plan groundwater strategy may petition the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) for a resolution of conflict between a GCD management plan and a regional water plan, and clarify that a regional water planning group can petition the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to request an inquiry into the joint planning process or the results of the process.  The bill would prohibit a GCD from granting a permit unless the applicant provides evidence of beneficial use. The bill would also prohibit a GCD from granting a transfer permit for municipal use unless the use is established by a contractual obligation based on a demonstrated need for water by an end user.  Passage of the bill is not expected to result in significant costs for the TWDB or TCEQ. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality   LBB Staff:  JOB, SZ, TL    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 30, 2009





  TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1714 by Hegar (Relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater conservation district in accordance with its management plan.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1714 by Hegar (Relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater conservation district in accordance with its management plan.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources 

 Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1714 by Hegar (Relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater conservation district in accordance with its management plan.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

SB1714 by Hegar (Relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater conservation district in accordance with its management plan.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would clarify the definition of beneficial use and provide evidential standards. The bill would require a groundwater conservation district (GCD) management plan consider and address the state water plan groundwater strategies that project reliance on groundwater resources in the GCD. The bill would clarify that a regional water planning group with an adopted state water plan groundwater strategy may petition the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) for a resolution of conflict between a GCD management plan and a regional water plan, and clarify that a regional water planning group can petition the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to request an inquiry into the joint planning process or the results of the process.  The bill would prohibit a GCD from granting a permit unless the applicant provides evidence of beneficial use. The bill would also prohibit a GCD from granting a transfer permit for municipal use unless the use is established by a contractual obligation based on a demonstrated need for water by an end user.  Passage of the bill is not expected to result in significant costs for the TWDB or TCEQ.

The bill would clarify the definition of beneficial use and provide evidential standards. The bill would require a groundwater conservation district (GCD) management plan consider and address the state water plan groundwater strategies that project reliance on groundwater resources in the GCD. The bill would clarify that a regional water planning group with an adopted state water plan groundwater strategy may petition the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) for a resolution of conflict between a GCD management plan and a regional water plan, and clarify that a regional water planning group can petition the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to request an inquiry into the joint planning process or the results of the process.  The bill would prohibit a GCD from granting a permit unless the applicant provides evidence of beneficial use. The bill would also prohibit a GCD from granting a transfer permit for municipal use unless the use is established by a contractual obligation based on a demonstrated need for water by an end user. 

Passage of the bill is not expected to result in significant costs for the TWDB or TCEQ.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality

580 Water Development Board, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality

LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, TL

 JOB, SZ, TL