LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 15, 2009 TO: Honorable Mark Strama, Chair, House Committee on Technology, Economic Development & Workforce FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1833 by Patrick, Dan ( Relating to county participation in the enterprise zone program.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted Depending upon the number of qualified hotel projects that could become eligible for state and local tax rebates, there could be an indeterminate revenue loss to the state. The following tables are provided only for illustrative purposes by the Comptroller's office and reflect the potential loss in state and local revenues for a single hypothetical project in one county and do not represent the entire potential loss if more than one project becomes eligible for state and local tax rebates. General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2010 ($4,426,000) 2011 ($4,641,000) 2012 ($4,868,000) 2013 ($5,100,000) 2014 ($5,344,000) All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromLocal Government 2010 ($4,426,000) ($3,159,000) 2011 ($4,641,000) ($3,327,000) 2012 ($4,868,000) ($3,493,000) 2013 ($5,100,000) ($3,664,000) 2014 ($5,344,000) ($3,843,000) Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Government Code to add a county having a population of 3.3 million or more to the local government entities that may, through an enterprise zone program, refund its local sales and use taxes paid by a qualified business on all taxable items purchased for use at the qualified business site related to the enterprise zone project or activity. Based on the 2000 U.S. Census, the bill would apply only to Harris County. Methodology Under the bill, more projects could be eligible for state and local tax rebates. For illustrative purposes only, the Comptroller of Public Accounts calculated an estimated fiscal impact using a single hypothetical project. The Comptroller estimated taxable receipts for sales and use, hotel, and mixed beverage taxes for a representative hotel based on Comptroller tax files. Taxable sales were multiplied by the state tax rate of 6.25 percent to determine the state sales tax loss to the General Revenue Fund. The fiscal impact on units of local government were estimated proportionally. Hotel receipts were multiplied by the 6 percent state hotel occupancy tax rate to estimate the loss to the General Revenue Fund and by a representative 7 percent local hotel tax rate to estimate the loss in local hotel tax revenues. General Revenue Fund losses in state mixed beverage tax collections were also estimated and then adjusted for local allocations to estimate the corresponding local losses. Note: The table above is provided for illustrative purposes only. It represents the potential loss in state and local revenues for a single hypothetical project in one county.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 15, 2009
TO: Honorable Mark Strama, Chair, House Committee on Technology, Economic Development & Workforce FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1833 by Patrick, Dan ( Relating to county participation in the enterprise zone program.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Mark Strama, Chair, House Committee on Technology, Economic Development & Workforce
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1833 by Patrick, Dan ( Relating to county participation in the enterprise zone program.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
Honorable Mark Strama, Chair, House Committee on Technology, Economic Development & Workforce
Honorable Mark Strama, Chair, House Committee on Technology, Economic Development & Workforce
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1833 by Patrick, Dan ( Relating to county participation in the enterprise zone program.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
SB1833 by Patrick, Dan ( Relating to county participation in the enterprise zone program.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
Depending upon the number of qualified hotel projects that could become eligible for state and local tax rebates, there could be an indeterminate revenue loss to the state.
Depending upon the number of qualified hotel projects that could become eligible for state and local tax rebates, there could be an indeterminate revenue loss to the state.
The following tables are provided only for illustrative purposes by the Comptroller's office and reflect the potential loss in state and local revenues for a single hypothetical project in one county and do not represent the entire potential loss if more than one project becomes eligible for state and local tax rebates.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2010 ($4,426,000) 2011 ($4,641,000) 2012 ($4,868,000) 2013 ($5,100,000) 2014 ($5,344,000)
2010 ($4,426,000)
2011 ($4,641,000)
2012 ($4,868,000)
2013 ($5,100,000)
2014 ($5,344,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromLocal Government 2010 ($4,426,000) ($3,159,000) 2011 ($4,641,000) ($3,327,000) 2012 ($4,868,000) ($3,493,000) 2013 ($5,100,000) ($3,664,000) 2014 ($5,344,000) ($3,843,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromLocal Government 2010 ($4,426,000) ($3,159,000) 2011 ($4,641,000) ($3,327,000) 2012 ($4,868,000) ($3,493,000) 2013 ($5,100,000) ($3,664,000) 2014 ($5,344,000) ($3,843,000)
2010 ($4,426,000) ($3,159,000)
2011 ($4,641,000) ($3,327,000)
2012 ($4,868,000) ($3,493,000)
2013 ($5,100,000) ($3,664,000)
2014 ($5,344,000) ($3,843,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Government Code to add a county having a population of 3.3 million or more to the local government entities that may, through an enterprise zone program, refund its local sales and use taxes paid by a qualified business on all taxable items purchased for use at the qualified business site related to the enterprise zone project or activity. Based on the 2000 U.S. Census, the bill would apply only to Harris County.
The bill would amend the Government Code to add a county having a population of 3.3 million or more to the local government entities that may, through an enterprise zone program, refund its local sales and use taxes paid by a qualified business on all taxable items purchased for use at the qualified business site related to the enterprise zone project or activity.
Based on the 2000 U.S. Census, the bill would apply only to Harris County.
Methodology
Under the bill, more projects could be eligible for state and local tax rebates. For illustrative purposes only, the Comptroller of Public Accounts calculated an estimated fiscal impact using a single hypothetical project. The Comptroller estimated taxable receipts for sales and use, hotel, and mixed beverage taxes for a representative hotel based on Comptroller tax files. Taxable sales were multiplied by the state tax rate of 6.25 percent to determine the state sales tax loss to the General Revenue Fund. The fiscal impact on units of local government were estimated proportionally. Hotel receipts were multiplied by the 6 percent state hotel occupancy tax rate to estimate the loss to the General Revenue Fund and by a representative 7 percent local hotel tax rate to estimate the loss in local hotel tax revenues. General Revenue Fund losses in state mixed beverage tax collections were also estimated and then adjusted for local allocations to estimate the corresponding local losses. Note: The table above is provided for illustrative purposes only. It represents the potential loss in state and local revenues for a single hypothetical project in one county.
Under the bill, more projects could be eligible for state and local tax rebates. For illustrative purposes only, the Comptroller of Public Accounts calculated an estimated fiscal impact using a single hypothetical project. The Comptroller estimated taxable receipts for sales and use, hotel, and mixed beverage taxes for a representative hotel based on Comptroller tax files. Taxable sales were multiplied by the state tax rate of 6.25 percent to determine the state sales tax loss to the General Revenue Fund. The fiscal impact on units of local government were estimated proportionally.
Hotel receipts were multiplied by the 6 percent state hotel occupancy tax rate to estimate the loss to the General Revenue Fund and by a representative 7 percent local hotel tax rate to estimate the loss in local hotel tax revenues. General Revenue Fund losses in state mixed beverage tax collections were also estimated and then adjusted for local allocations to estimate the corresponding local losses.
Note: The table above is provided for illustrative purposes only. It represents the potential loss in state and local revenues for a single hypothetical project in one county.
Local Government Impact
The fiscal impact would depend on the number of projects and activities to which a county would make a tax refund and the amount of sales and use tax applicable to those projects and activities. A theoretical example of the impact to local government for illustrative purposes is shown in the tables above.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JOB, DB, JRO, SD
JOB, DB, JRO, SD