Texas Senate Bill SB184

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/2/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/8/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to "no regrets" greenhouse gas emissions reduction strategies.

Impact

If enacted, SB184 could have significant implications for both state environmental policies and the economy. By encouraging the development of cost-effective strategies for reducing greenhouse gases, the bill aims to enhance sustainability and promote cleaner air. The focus on approaches that do not impose additional financial burdens on the populace could facilitate public acceptance, making it easier for companies and consumers to adopt greener practices. This may lead to an overall reduction in emissions while simultaneously fostering economic growth.

Summary

Senate Bill 184, titled 'No Regrets' Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies, introduces measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Texas. The bill mandates the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to develop a report on potential strategies for emission reductions. These strategies must be designed to either result in net savings for consumers and businesses or be implemented without incurring additional costs. The bill emphasizes the importance of considering long-term net costs rather than just short-term capital investments in evaluating the potential effectiveness of these strategies.

Contention

Despite its positive intentions, SB184 may face some contention from various stakeholders. Critics may express concerns about whether the outlined strategies can truly meet the dual objectives of reducing emissions and maintaining affordability for consumers and businesses. There may also be skepticism regarding the commission's capacity to identify effective strategies that meet these criteria, especially in a diverse state like Texas where economic and environmental interests often clash. Any perceived inadequacies in the implementation of the bill could lead to debates in future legislative sessions about its effectiveness and scope.