Texas Senate Bill SB1860

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/17/09

Caption

Relating to animal shelter standards; providing a civil penalty.

Impact

The bill imposes civil penalties for violations of the established animal shelter rules, with fines ranging from $100 to $500 for each violation and per day of continuing violations. This civil penalty provision is designed to ensure compliance and deter neglect or misconduct within shelters. It empowers both the state and local authorities to initiate civil suits against parties that threaten or violate the provisions of the chapter, thereby heightening the accountability of those operating animal shelters.

Summary

SB1860 aims to establish new standards for animal shelters in Texas through amendments to Chapter 823 of the Health and Safety Code. The bill stipulates that counties may enforce these standards, providing a framework for better regulation of animal accommodation and care across the state without allowing counties to set their own operational standards. This is intended to create a more standardized approach to animal shelter management, promoting better welfare for animals housed in these facilities.

Conclusion

In summary, SB1860 represents a significant step towards formalizing and enforcing animal shelter standards in Texas, with implications for both animal welfare and local governance. By providing a mechanism for civil penalties and enabling county enforcement, the bill seeks to instill a stronger compliance culture in animal welfare practices, yet it must balance these goals with the practical capacities of local shelters.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance of authority between state and local governments concerning animal welfare. While the bill is framed as a necessary step for improving animal care standards, there may be concerns about how these regulations could affect smaller or community-run shelters that might struggle with compliance costs. Some advocates for animal rights may argue that without the ability for local jurisdictions to set their standards, specific community needs may be overlooked.