Texas Senate Bill SB1980

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the regulation of massage parlors by certain counties; providing penalties.

Impact

If enacted, SB1980 grants significant regulatory authority to the commissioners court of qualified counties to enact specific rules prohibiting or regulating the operation of massage parlors in unincorporated areas. The ability to impose regulations intended to protect public health and safety reflects a shift towards greater local control over issues seen as impacting community wellbeing. Furthermore, the bill outlines penalties for violations, including civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each infraction and criminal liability for intentional violations, categorized as Class A misdemeanors.

Summary

SB1980 is a legislative bill aimed at regulating massage parlors within counties in Texas that have a population of 3.3 million or more. The bill defines 'massage parlor' specifically as establishments where services are offered by nude or partially nude employees, or where sexual contact occurs. This targeted approach is intended to address concerns regarding the proliferation of establishments that may engage in illegal activities under the guise of legitimate massage services.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SB1980 seeks to enhance the local government's ability to oversee massage parlors, ensuring that they operate within defined legal and ethical boundaries. The broader ramifications of the bill will depend on its implementation at the county level, and how communities adapt to the new regulatory framework established under this legislation.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding SB1980. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to combat illegal activities occurring under the auspices of massage therapy, thus promoting community safety. However, critics may raise concerns that extensive regulation could impact legitimate businesses and restrict access to therapeutic services, emphasizing the need for balance between regulation and service availability. The fear of over-regulation potentially driving legitimate massage therapists out of business could be a point of ongoing legislative debate.