LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 9, 2009 TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB2447 by Uresti (Relating to the right of certain counties to maintain local control over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would add Chapter 162 to the Local Government Code to authorize meet and confer for employees, except police officers who are covered under Chapter 174, in a county with a population of more than 1 million that has adopted a resolution or policy providing for a consultation system in which the county will meet or consult with an employee association representing employees if the association is supported by at least 30 percent of the employees eligible to participate. The bill sets forth the procedures for establishing, and those for repealing, an agreement between a county and an employee association and specifies that a county may not be denied local control over wages, salaries, rates of pay, hours of work, other terms and conditions of employment, or other state-mandated personnel issues. Local Government Impact Based on population size, the bill would apply to four counties: Bexar, Dallas, Harris, and Tarrant. According to the Texas Association of Counties, Bexar County has adopted a resolution as indicated in the applicability criteria of the bill and Harris County has not. The association did not have information from Dallas or Tarrant counties. At a minimum, a county would incur costs associated with placing on an election ballot a proposal for authorizing meet and confer for the county employees and administrative costs during the establishment and bargaining processes. All other costs would depend on the agreement finalized between the county and the county employees association, although according to the Texas Association of Counties, the costs could be significant. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 9, 2009
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB2447 by Uresti (Relating to the right of certain counties to maintain local control over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB2447 by Uresti (Relating to the right of certain counties to maintain local control over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.), As Introduced
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB2447 by Uresti (Relating to the right of certain counties to maintain local control over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.), As Introduced
SB2447 by Uresti (Relating to the right of certain counties to maintain local control over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would add Chapter 162 to the Local Government Code to authorize meet and confer for employees, except police officers who are covered under Chapter 174, in a county with a population of more than 1 million that has adopted a resolution or policy providing for a consultation system in which the county will meet or consult with an employee association representing employees if the association is supported by at least 30 percent of the employees eligible to participate. The bill sets forth the procedures for establishing, and those for repealing, an agreement between a county and an employee association and specifies that a county may not be denied local control over wages, salaries, rates of pay, hours of work, other terms and conditions of employment, or other state-mandated personnel issues.
The bill would add Chapter 162 to the Local Government Code to authorize meet and confer for employees, except police officers who are covered under Chapter 174, in a county with a population of more than 1 million that has adopted a resolution or policy providing for a consultation system in which the county will meet or consult with an employee association representing employees if the association is supported by at least 30 percent of the employees eligible to participate.
The bill sets forth the procedures for establishing, and those for repealing, an agreement between a county and an employee association and specifies that a county may not be denied local control over wages, salaries, rates of pay, hours of work, other terms and conditions of employment, or other state-mandated personnel issues.
Local Government Impact
Based on population size, the bill would apply to four counties: Bexar, Dallas, Harris, and Tarrant. According to the Texas Association of Counties, Bexar County has adopted a resolution as indicated in the applicability criteria of the bill and Harris County has not. The association did not have information from Dallas or Tarrant counties. At a minimum, a county would incur costs associated with placing on an election ballot a proposal for authorizing meet and confer for the county employees and administrative costs during the establishment and bargaining processes. All other costs would depend on the agreement finalized between the county and the county employees association, although according to the Texas Association of Counties, the costs could be significant.
Based on population size, the bill would apply to four counties: Bexar, Dallas, Harris, and Tarrant. According to the Texas Association of Counties, Bexar County has adopted a resolution as indicated in the applicability criteria of the bill and Harris County has not. The association did not have information from Dallas or Tarrant counties.
At a minimum, a county would incur costs associated with placing on an election ballot a proposal for authorizing meet and confer for the county employees and administrative costs during the establishment and bargaining processes. All other costs would depend on the agreement finalized between the county and the county employees association, although according to the Texas Association of Counties, the costs could be significant.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, DB
JOB, DB