Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB2587 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 14, 2009      TO: Honorable Craig Estes, Chair, Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Affairs      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB2587 by Estes (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity from certain suits by certain municipalities.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would apply only to a home-rule municipality with a population of less than 30,000 that is located in a county with a population of less than 140,000. An applicable municipality would waive sovereign immunity from suit for the purpose of adjdicating a claim of breach of contract if the municipality enters into a contract with a private entity for the sale or conveyance of not less than 400 acres or more than 1,000 acres of land that was acquired by the municipality from an agency of the United States. A plaintiff who prevails in an action brought under the provisions of the bill would be entitled only to specific performance of the terms of the contract, reasonable attorney's fees, and court costs. Local Government Impact Because the bill would not have statewide impact on units of local government of the same type or class, no comment from this office is required by the rules of the House/Senate as to its probable fiscal implication on units of local government.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, SD, DB, KJG    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 14, 2009





  TO: Honorable Craig Estes, Chair, Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Affairs      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB2587 by Estes (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity from certain suits by certain municipalities.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Craig Estes, Chair, Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Affairs
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB2587 by Estes (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity from certain suits by certain municipalities.), As Introduced

 Honorable Craig Estes, Chair, Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Affairs 

 Honorable Craig Estes, Chair, Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Affairs 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB2587 by Estes (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity from certain suits by certain municipalities.), As Introduced

SB2587 by Estes (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity from certain suits by certain municipalities.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would apply only to a home-rule municipality with a population of less than 30,000 that is located in a county with a population of less than 140,000. An applicable municipality would waive sovereign immunity from suit for the purpose of adjdicating a claim of breach of contract if the municipality enters into a contract with a private entity for the sale or conveyance of not less than 400 acres or more than 1,000 acres of land that was acquired by the municipality from an agency of the United States. A plaintiff who prevails in an action brought under the provisions of the bill would be entitled only to specific performance of the terms of the contract, reasonable attorney's fees, and court costs.

The bill would apply only to a home-rule municipality with a population of less than 30,000 that is located in a county with a population of less than 140,000. An applicable municipality would waive sovereign immunity from suit for the purpose of adjdicating a claim of breach of contract if the municipality enters into a contract with a private entity for the sale or conveyance of not less than 400 acres or more than 1,000 acres of land that was acquired by the municipality from an agency of the United States.

A plaintiff who prevails in an action brought under the provisions of the bill would be entitled only to specific performance of the terms of the contract, reasonable attorney's fees, and court costs.

Local Government Impact

Because the bill would not have statewide impact on units of local government of the same type or class, no comment from this office is required by the rules of the House/Senate as to its probable fiscal implication on units of local government.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, SD, DB, KJG

 JOB, SD, DB, KJG