LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 13, 2009 TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB358 by Patrick, Dan (Relating to the enforcement of state and federal laws governing immigration by certain governmental entities.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Local Government Code to prohibit a local government entity from adopting a policy under which the entity would not fully enforce state or federal laws, including laws relating to drugs, immigrants, or immigration. Local governments would also be prohibited from restricting their officers, employees, or other bodies from maintaining information related to immigration status of any individual and sending that information to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or from assisting, cooperating with, or providing access to a municipal or county jail to a federal immigration officer. If a local government entity were not in compliance with these prohibitions, that entity would be prohibited from receiving state grant funds for the fiscal year following the year in which the rule, order, ordinance, or policy is adopted or the determination is made that the entity intentionally failed to fully enforce state or federal laws related to immigration. The Governor's Office of Budget, Planning, and Policy (GOBPP) would be required to adopt rules to implement the requirements of the bill uniformly among the state agencies from which state grant funds are distributed to a local entity. Based on analysis by the GOBPP, any administrative costs incurred in implementing provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. Local Government Impact A local entity that does not comply with the proposed changes in statute and that would otherwise qualify for and receive state funding would experience a revenue loss. The amount of the revenue loss would vary, depending on what grant funds had been available and otherwise awarded to the entity. Source Agencies:301 Office of the Governor LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 13, 2009
TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB358 by Patrick, Dan (Relating to the enforcement of state and federal laws governing immigration by certain governmental entities.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB358 by Patrick, Dan (Relating to the enforcement of state and federal laws governing immigration by certain governmental entities.), As Introduced
Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security
Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB358 by Patrick, Dan (Relating to the enforcement of state and federal laws governing immigration by certain governmental entities.), As Introduced
SB358 by Patrick, Dan (Relating to the enforcement of state and federal laws governing immigration by certain governmental entities.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Local Government Code to prohibit a local government entity from adopting a policy under which the entity would not fully enforce state or federal laws, including laws relating to drugs, immigrants, or immigration. Local governments would also be prohibited from restricting their officers, employees, or other bodies from maintaining information related to immigration status of any individual and sending that information to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or from assisting, cooperating with, or providing access to a municipal or county jail to a federal immigration officer. If a local government entity were not in compliance with these prohibitions, that entity would be prohibited from receiving state grant funds for the fiscal year following the year in which the rule, order, ordinance, or policy is adopted or the determination is made that the entity intentionally failed to fully enforce state or federal laws related to immigration. The Governor's Office of Budget, Planning, and Policy (GOBPP) would be required to adopt rules to implement the requirements of the bill uniformly among the state agencies from which state grant funds are distributed to a local entity. Based on analysis by the GOBPP, any administrative costs incurred in implementing provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
The bill would amend the Local Government Code to prohibit a local government entity from adopting a policy under which the entity would not fully enforce state or federal laws, including laws relating to drugs, immigrants, or immigration. Local governments would also be prohibited from restricting their officers, employees, or other bodies from maintaining information related to immigration status of any individual and sending that information to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or from assisting, cooperating with, or providing access to a municipal or county jail to a federal immigration officer.
If a local government entity were not in compliance with these prohibitions, that entity would be prohibited from receiving state grant funds for the fiscal year following the year in which the rule, order, ordinance, or policy is adopted or the determination is made that the entity intentionally failed to fully enforce state or federal laws related to immigration. The Governor's Office of Budget, Planning, and Policy (GOBPP) would be required to adopt rules to implement the requirements of the bill uniformly among the state agencies from which state grant funds are distributed to a local entity.
Based on analysis by the GOBPP, any administrative costs incurred in implementing provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
A local entity that does not comply with the proposed changes in statute and that would otherwise qualify for and receive state funding would experience a revenue loss. The amount of the revenue loss would vary, depending on what grant funds had been available and otherwise awarded to the entity.
Source Agencies: 301 Office of the Governor
301 Office of the Governor
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, DB
JOB, KJG, DB