Texas Senate Bill SB37

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/1/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/8/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/13/09
• Voted on by House: 5/18/09
• Governor Action: 5/30/09
• Enrolled: 5/19/09
• Passed: 5/30/09

Caption

Relating to providing home-based and community-based support services under the Medicaid program to persons who are deaf-blind with multiple disabilities.

Impact

If enacted, SB37 will specifically expand the eligibility for services under the Medicaid program to include younger individuals who are deaf-blind and have multiple disabilities. This change would allow for the incorporation of age-appropriate services tailored to the needs of children, which currently may not be addressed adequately under existing programs. The executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission will be tasked with securing federal approval for these changes, which is a critical step in implementing the bill's provisions.

Summary

SB37 aims to enhance the provision of home- and community-based support services under the Medicaid program specifically for individuals who are deaf-blind with multiple disabilities. The bill proposes to amend the Human Resources Code, establishing eligibility criteria for a waiver program that allows individuals of any age to access these crucial services, contingent on the availability of appropriated funds. This inclusive approach should potentially provide a broader range of individuals access to necessary resources without an age restriction, addressing a significant gap in the current service provision for this vulnerable population.

Contention

Despite the positive intentions behind SB37, there could be notable points of contention among legislators and stakeholders. Some may express concerns regarding the sufficiency of funds to support an expanded waiver program, especially in a time of fiscal constraints. Additionally, there may be debates about the adequacy of existing structures to deliver the proposed services effectively. The possibility of opposition could arise from entities worried about the implications of extending resources to a wider demographic and the administrative ability to meet the increased demand.