Texas Senate Bill SB448

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/20/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/2/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/20/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the authority of the Texas Department of Transportation to mitigate adverse environmental impacts resulting from the construction, improvement, or maintenance of state highways or state highway facilities.

Impact

The enactment of SB448 is poised to influence state regulations concerning transportation infrastructure and environmental protection efforts. By formalizing the procedures through which TxDOT can mitigate negative ecological effects, the bill fosters a more structured approach to environmental compliance during highway-related projects. This could help streamline efforts by reducing the bureaucratic red tape historically associated with obtaining environmental clearances, thus potentially expediting project timelines while ensuring ecological oversight.

Summary

SB448 addresses the authority of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) regarding the management of environmental impacts that arise from activities related to the construction, improvement, or maintenance of state highways and facilities. The bill empowers TxDOT to implement mitigation strategies directly linked to these infrastructural projects, allowing the department to engage in various means of property management to offset adverse environmental consequences. The intent behind this legislation is to ensure that highway projects adhere to environmental standards while optimizing resource allocation for the mitigation processes.

Contention

While the bill emphasizes mitigation, it may raise concerns regarding its implications on local agencies' roles in environmental stewardship. Critics may argue that broad authority delegated to TxDOT could risk prioritizing construction efficiencies over localized ecological considerations. The balance between facilitating transportation improvements and safeguarding the environment remains a focal point of contention, as stakeholders will likely evaluate how effectively TxDOT engages in responsible oversight and management of mitigation efforts.