LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION Revision 1 March 6, 2009 TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB497 by Wentworth (Relating to compensation paid to certain judges and justices.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code by making the Judiciary Section, Comptroller's Department, rather than the Texas Judicial Council the entity responsible for the payment of salary supplements for district judges presiding over asbestos- or silica-related multidistrict litigation cases. Funding for the supplements are $63,250 each fiscal year. The bill would also clarify that judicial longevity pay does not constitute additional salary for purposes of determining whether a judge's salary exceeds the statutory maximum. Because the bill would transfer statutory authority for paying the salary supplements from one agency to another, no fiscal implication is anticipated. Local Government Impact The bill would authorize a county commissioners court to provide longevity pay to a judge or justice who would otherwise be eligible for such pay if the service credit the judge or justice earned as a statutory county court judge was established in the retirement system. It is assumed that the bill would not have a significant fiscal implication to local government because county commissioners would only authorize longevity pay if the county had sufficient resources to absorb the costs. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, TP, TB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 1
March 6, 2009
Revision 1
Revision 1
TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB497 by Wentworth (Relating to compensation paid to certain judges and justices.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB497 by Wentworth (Relating to compensation paid to certain judges and justices.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB497 by Wentworth (Relating to compensation paid to certain judges and justices.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
SB497 by Wentworth (Relating to compensation paid to certain judges and justices.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code by making the Judiciary Section, Comptroller's Department, rather than the Texas Judicial Council the entity responsible for the payment of salary supplements for district judges presiding over asbestos- or silica-related multidistrict litigation cases. Funding for the supplements are $63,250 each fiscal year. The bill would also clarify that judicial longevity pay does not constitute additional salary for purposes of determining whether a judge's salary exceeds the statutory maximum. Because the bill would transfer statutory authority for paying the salary supplements from one agency to another, no fiscal implication is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code by making the Judiciary Section, Comptroller's Department, rather than the Texas Judicial Council the entity responsible for the payment of salary supplements for district judges presiding over asbestos- or silica-related multidistrict litigation cases. Funding for the supplements are $63,250 each fiscal year. The bill would also clarify that judicial longevity pay does not constitute additional salary for purposes of determining whether a judge's salary exceeds the statutory maximum. Because the bill would transfer statutory authority for paying the salary supplements from one agency to another, no fiscal implication is anticipated.
Local Government Impact
The bill would authorize a county commissioners court to provide longevity pay to a judge or justice who would otherwise be eligible for such pay if the service credit the judge or justice earned as a statutory county court judge was established in the retirement system. It is assumed that the bill would not have a significant fiscal implication to local government because county commissioners would only authorize longevity pay if the county had sufficient resources to absorb the costs.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, TP, TB
JOB, TP, TB