LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 11, 2009 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB712 by Hegar (Relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases. The bill would require a judge to order certain criminal defendants undergo testing for HIV infection in certain situations. This is a change from the current law which permits the judge to order a criminal defendant to undergo such testing. The bill would likely result in more HIV tests being ordered than are currently ordered. While there is a cost for the testing, the bill states that the person charged with the offense shall pay the costs of testing. Accordingly, no significant cost increases to the state are anticipated. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, JP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 11, 2009
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB712 by Hegar (Relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB712 by Hegar (Relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases.), As Engrossed
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB712 by Hegar (Relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases.), As Engrossed
SB712 by Hegar (Relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases. The bill would require a judge to order certain criminal defendants undergo testing for HIV infection in certain situations. This is a change from the current law which permits the judge to order a criminal defendant to undergo such testing. The bill would likely result in more HIV tests being ordered than are currently ordered. While there is a cost for the testing, the bill states that the person charged with the offense shall pay the costs of testing. Accordingly, no significant cost increases to the state are anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the requirement that certain defendants in a criminal case undergo testing for HIV infection and other diseases. The bill would require a judge to order certain criminal defendants undergo testing for HIV infection in certain situations. This is a change from the current law which permits the judge to order a criminal defendant to undergo such testing.
The bill would likely result in more HIV tests being ordered than are currently ordered. While there is a cost for the testing, the bill states that the person charged with the offense shall pay the costs of testing. Accordingly, no significant cost increases to the state are anticipated.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, JP
JOB, ESi, JP