BILL ANALYSIS Senate Research Center S.B. 780 81R3907 KFF-D By: Watson et al. Jurisprudence 3/13/2009 As Filed AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT One of the important functions of the Texas Supreme Court is to make the decision of whether to grant a petition for review. Public access to judicial decisions, including votes on petitions for review, plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the judiciary. Public interest in disclosure is heightened by the selection of judges through privately funded elections and thus, secrecy prevents the voting public from holding the justices accountable for their voting record while in office. The Supreme Court has no valid interest in keeping the voting records secret, given that the votes themselves do not reveal internal deliberations of the justices or confidential information about parties to the case. As proposed, S.B. 780 requires the Texas Supreme Court to disclose how each member voted on a petition for review or application in an order granting, refusing, dismissing, or denying a petition for review. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter A, Chapter 22, Government Code, by adding Section 22.0071, as follows: Sec. 22.0071. DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUAL VOTES OF MEMBERS. Requires the supreme court, in an order granting, refusing, dismissing, or denying a petition for review, to state how each member voted on the petition or application. SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective. SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 2009.
BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Research Center S.B. 780
81R3907 KFF-D By: Watson et al.
Jurisprudence
3/13/2009
As Filed
AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT
One of the important functions of the Texas Supreme Court is to make the decision of whether to grant a petition for review. Public access to judicial decisions, including votes on petitions for review, plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the judiciary. Public interest in disclosure is heightened by the selection of judges through privately funded elections and thus, secrecy prevents the voting public from holding the justices accountable for their voting record while in office.
The Supreme Court has no valid interest in keeping the voting records secret, given that the votes themselves do not reveal internal deliberations of the justices or confidential information about parties to the case.
As proposed, S.B. 780 requires the Texas Supreme Court to disclose how each member voted on a petition for review or application in an order granting, refusing, dismissing, or denying a petition for review.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Subchapter A, Chapter 22, Government Code, by adding Section 22.0071, as follows:
Sec. 22.0071. DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUAL VOTES OF MEMBERS. Requires the supreme court, in an order granting, refusing, dismissing, or denying a petition for review, to state how each member voted on the petition or application.
SECTION 2. Makes application of this Act prospective.
SECTION 3. Effective date: September 1, 2009.