LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 19, 2009 TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB786 by Nelson (Relating to the protection of children from abuse and neglect.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require the Department of Family and Protective Services to satisfy the court that certain conditions have been met in order to obtain a temporary restraining order in a suit for the removal of an alleged perpetrator from the home of a child. The agency indicates any cost to implement provisions of the bill would be minimal and can be absorbed within available resources. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:530 Family and Protective Services, Department of LBB Staff: JOB, CL, NM, LR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 19, 2009
TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB786 by Nelson (Relating to the protection of children from abuse and neglect.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB786 by Nelson (Relating to the protection of children from abuse and neglect.), As Engrossed
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB786 by Nelson (Relating to the protection of children from abuse and neglect.), As Engrossed
SB786 by Nelson (Relating to the protection of children from abuse and neglect.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would require the Department of Family and Protective Services to satisfy the court that certain conditions have been met in order to obtain a temporary restraining order in a suit for the removal of an alleged perpetrator from the home of a child. The agency indicates any cost to implement provisions of the bill would be minimal and can be absorbed within available resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: JOB, CL, NM, LR
JOB, CL, NM, LR