Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1241 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 25, 2011      TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a constable to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy constable. The bill also would authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy constable executing an individual or blanket surety bond. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 25, 2011





  TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Introduced

 Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety 

 Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Introduced

HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a constable to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy constable. The bill also would authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy constable executing an individual or blanket surety bond.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TP

 JOB, ESi, TP