Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1241 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 21, 2011      TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Engrossed    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a constable to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy constable. The bill also would authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy constable executing an individual or blanket surety bond. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 21, 2011





  TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Engrossed

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Engrossed

HB1241 by Zedler (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.), As Engrossed



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a constable to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy constable. The bill also would authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy constable executing an individual or blanket surety bond.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TP

 JOB, ESi, TP