LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 10, 2011 TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1622 by Menendez (Relating to suits to enjoin gang activity that constitutes a public nuisance.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. To remove the current language regarding a graffiti offense which requires a pecuniary loss of $500 or more, or that the graffiti offense occurs at a school, an institution of higher education, and other locations as described. The bill would provide a trial on the merits under certain conditions. The bill is not anticipated to impact judicial workloads. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact It is assumed that any additional burden on local courts and law enforcement associated with the bill could be absorbed with existing resources. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, JT, TB, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 10, 2011
TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1622 by Menendez (Relating to suits to enjoin gang activity that constitutes a public nuisance.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1622 by Menendez (Relating to suits to enjoin gang activity that constitutes a public nuisance.), As Introduced
Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1622 by Menendez (Relating to suits to enjoin gang activity that constitutes a public nuisance.), As Introduced
HB1622 by Menendez (Relating to suits to enjoin gang activity that constitutes a public nuisance.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
To remove the current language regarding a graffiti offense which requires a pecuniary loss of $500 or more, or that the graffiti offense occurs at a school, an institution of higher education, and other locations as described. The bill would provide a trial on the merits under certain conditions. The bill is not anticipated to impact judicial workloads. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Local Government Impact
It is assumed that any additional burden on local courts and law enforcement associated with the bill could be absorbed with existing resources.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, JT, TB, KKR
JOB, JT, TB, KKR