LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 25, 2011 TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty.), As Passed 2nd House No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, which establishes the procedures for an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case. The bill would provide for either the attorney previously representing the applicant, if the attorney seeks the appointment, the Office of Capital Writs, or other competent counsel to be appointed to represent indigent defendants when the convicting court receives notice that the requirements have been met for a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus. According to the Office of Capital Writs (OCW), there may be additional costs to the new office for increased filings; however, this analysis assumes that costs, if any, could be absorbed within the OCWs existing resources. Accordingly, to the extent the bill would amend habeas corpus procedures, no significant fiscal implication to the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact The bill could have costs at the local level in cases where the Office of Capital Writs is not appointed, as any costs for other appointed counsel above $25,000 incurred for a death penalty writ would be paid by the county of the convicting court; however costs to a given county would vary depending on the number and cost of such cases in a locality in a given year. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 215 Office of Capital Writs LBB Staff: JOB, SD, TB, ESi, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 25, 2011
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty.), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty.), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty.), As Passed 2nd House
HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty.), As Passed 2nd House
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, which establishes the procedures for an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case. The bill would provide for either the attorney previously representing the applicant, if the attorney seeks the appointment, the Office of Capital Writs, or other competent counsel to be appointed to represent indigent defendants when the convicting court receives notice that the requirements have been met for a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus. According to the Office of Capital Writs (OCW), there may be additional costs to the new office for increased filings; however, this analysis assumes that costs, if any, could be absorbed within the OCWs existing resources. Accordingly, to the extent the bill would amend habeas corpus procedures, no significant fiscal implication to the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Local Government Impact
The bill could have costs at the local level in cases where the Office of Capital Writs is not appointed, as any costs for other appointed counsel above $25,000 incurred for a death penalty writ would be paid by the county of the convicting court; however costs to a given county would vary depending on the number and cost of such cases in a locality in a given year.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 215 Office of Capital Writs
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 215 Office of Capital Writs
LBB Staff: JOB, SD, TB, ESi, KKR
JOB, SD, TB, ESi, KKR