Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1649 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 18, 2011      TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1649 by Marquez (Relating to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county.), As Engrossed    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code related to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county. The bill would specify that Subchapter F would apply only to new residential construction in certain counties unless the new residential construction meets certain criteria as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill also would require a commissioners court to certify that a new residential construction project meets all applicable building code requirements prior to permanent electric, gas, water, or sewer service utility connection in the project. Local Government Impact There could be costs to an applicable county for the issuance of a written certificate of compliance for new residential construction, but the amounts would vary depending on whether the county chose to issue certificates of compliance, the number certificates that are requested and issued and the costs associated with the certificates. It is assumed that a county would require the issuance of certificates of compliance only if sufficient funds were available to cover the costs or it would not result in a negative fiscal impact.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, KKR, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 18, 2011





  TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1649 by Marquez (Relating to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1649 by Marquez (Relating to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 

 Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1649 by Marquez (Relating to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county.), As Engrossed

HB1649 by Marquez (Relating to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county.), As Engrossed



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code related to building code standards for new residential construction in the unincorporated area of a county. The bill would specify that Subchapter F would apply only to new residential construction in certain counties unless the new residential construction meets certain criteria as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill also would require a commissioners court to certify that a new residential construction project meets all applicable building code requirements prior to permanent electric, gas, water, or sewer service utility connection in the project.

Local Government Impact

There could be costs to an applicable county for the issuance of a written certificate of compliance for new residential construction, but the amounts would vary depending on whether the county chose to issue certificates of compliance, the number certificates that are requested and issued and the costs associated with the certificates. It is assumed that a county would require the issuance of certificates of compliance only if sufficient funds were available to cover the costs or it would not result in a negative fiscal impact.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, KKR, TP

 JOB, KKR, TP