Texas House Bill HB1750

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/12/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 3/23/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Report Pass: 4/4/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Refer: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 5/19/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the authority of the Texas Department of Transportation to lease and contract for the operation of rolling stock during certain emergencies.

Impact

The bill modifies Section 91.071 of the Transportation Code, emphasizing that the department can utilize state highway funds and other appropriate financial resources to implement these emergency measures. This expanded ability aims to ensure that transportation services remain operational during crises, contributing to public safety and disaster response efforts. However, the power to contract without competitive bidding for up to 90 days could raise concerns regarding oversight and transparency in government spending, especially in high-stakes scenarios where speed is prioritized over competitive processes.

Summary

House Bill 1750 aims to enhance the operational capabilities of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) during emergencies by granting it the authority to lease and contract out the operation of rolling stock. The legislation defines 'rolling stock' as trains and related vehicles used for rail services, allowing for quick responses to natural or man-made disasters that threaten these services. In cases where an emergency situation arises, the executive director of TxDOT can issue an order to facilitate these contracts without delay, thereby improving the state's readiness to maintain essential transportation functions under duress.

Contention

While the bill seems beneficial in enhancing emergency preparedness, it may not be without contention. Critics might argue that the bypassing of competitive bidding could lead to cronyism or mismanagement of funds, raising concerns about the accountability of the TxDOT in contracting decisions. Moreover, the emphasis on expediency in emergencies should be balanced with maintaining public trust in how funds are allocated and which vendors are chosen for such important services. Future debates might center around finding the right balance between efficiency in crisis response and ensuring that the procurement processes remain fair and transparent.