Texas House Bill HB1799

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/27/11
• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Voted on by House: 5/11/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Report Pass: 4/20/11
• Engrossed: 5/11/11
• Refer: 5/13/11

Caption

Relating to the exemption of certain real estate professionals from registration as property tax consultants.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would potentially streamline the process for real estate professionals in Texas, allowing them to provide property tax consulting services without the need for additional registration as property tax consultants. This might facilitate easier access to property tax services for property owners while also allowing real estate professionals to diversify the services they offer. The simplified regulatory framework could encourage more professionals to engage in property tax consulting, which may enhance competition and service availability in the market.

Summary

House Bill 1799 aims to amend the current regulations surrounding property tax consultants in Texas. Specifically, the bill seeks to exempt certain real estate professionals from the requirement to register as property tax consultants under the Occupations Code. This exemption is intended for individuals licensed as real estate brokers or salespersons who provide consulting services related to farms, ranches, single-family residences, or commercial properties. The focus is to reduce the regulatory burden on professionals operating in the real estate sector who may also provide property tax-related services as part of their regular duties.

Contention

While the bill offers potential benefits by reducing regulatory requirements, it may also raise concerns among some stakeholders. Critics might argue that the lack of registration could lead to inadequate oversight of property tax consulting services, potentially leaving property owners vulnerable to unqualified advice. Additionally, there could be apprehensions about the standards of practice within the sector, as the absence of registration might dilute accountability for the services provided. Legislative discussions may revolve around these points of contention as various parties express their views on the implications of the proposed changes.