Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1856 House Committee Report / Analysis

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS             C.S.H.B. 1856     By: Woolley     Criminal Jurisprudence     Committee Report (Substituted)             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Under current law, the offense of tampering with a witness is a state jail felony. As such, there is little to deter a defendant accused of capital murder or a first or second degree felony offense from intimidating or coercing a witness to affect the witness's testimony or appearance in court. C.S.H.B. 1856 seeks to deter witness intimidation by making changes relating to the prosecution of and punishment for the offense of tampering with a witness.        RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.       ANALYSIS    C.S.H.B. 1856 amends the Penal Code to increase the penalty for tampering with a witness from a state jail felony to a felony of the third degree, except that if the official proceeding is part of the prosecution of a criminal case, the bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness the same category of offense as the most serious offense charged in that criminal case. The bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness a felony of the first degree if the most serious offense charged in the criminal case is a capital felony. The bill specifies that if an actor's conduct constitutes the offense of tampering with a witness and also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under either law or both laws.       EFFECTIVE DATE    September 1, 2011.       COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE       C.S.H.B. 1856 omits provisions included in the original expanding the conditions that constitute the offense of tampering with a witness and specifying that, for purposes of that offense, an official proceeding is not required to be pending at the time of the offense and the testimony, information, document, or thing that is or could be withheld is not required to be admissible in evidence or free from a claim of privilege.      

BILL ANALYSIS

# BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

C.S.H.B. 1856
By: Woolley
Criminal Jurisprudence
Committee Report (Substituted)

C.S.H.B. 1856

By: Woolley

Criminal Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Substituted)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Under current law, the offense of tampering with a witness is a state jail felony. As such, there is little to deter a defendant accused of capital murder or a first or second degree felony offense from intimidating or coercing a witness to affect the witness's testimony or appearance in court. C.S.H.B. 1856 seeks to deter witness intimidation by making changes relating to the prosecution of and punishment for the offense of tampering with a witness.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS    C.S.H.B. 1856 amends the Penal Code to increase the penalty for tampering with a witness from a state jail felony to a felony of the third degree, except that if the official proceeding is part of the prosecution of a criminal case, the bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness the same category of offense as the most serious offense charged in that criminal case. The bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness a felony of the first degree if the most serious offense charged in the criminal case is a capital felony. The bill specifies that if an actor's conduct constitutes the offense of tampering with a witness and also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under either law or both laws.
EFFECTIVE DATE    September 1, 2011.
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
C.S.H.B. 1856 omits provisions included in the original expanding the conditions that constitute the offense of tampering with a witness and specifying that, for purposes of that offense, an official proceeding is not required to be pending at the time of the offense and the testimony, information, document, or thing that is or could be withheld is not required to be admissible in evidence or free from a claim of privilege.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

 

Under current law, the offense of tampering with a witness is a state jail felony. As such, there is little to deter a defendant accused of capital murder or a first or second degree felony offense from intimidating or coercing a witness to affect the witness's testimony or appearance in court. C.S.H.B. 1856 seeks to deter witness intimidation by making changes relating to the prosecution of and punishment for the offense of tampering with a witness. 

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS 

 

C.S.H.B. 1856 amends the Penal Code to increase the penalty for tampering with a witness from a state jail felony to a felony of the third degree, except that if the official proceeding is part of the prosecution of a criminal case, the bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness the same category of offense as the most serious offense charged in that criminal case. The bill makes an offense of tampering with a witness a felony of the first degree if the most serious offense charged in the criminal case is a capital felony. The bill specifies that if an actor's conduct constitutes the offense of tampering with a witness and also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under either law or both laws.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE 

 

September 1, 2011.

 

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE

 

C.S.H.B. 1856 omits provisions included in the original expanding the conditions that constitute the offense of tampering with a witness and specifying that, for purposes of that offense, an official proceeding is not required to be pending at the time of the offense and the testimony, information, document, or thing that is or could be withheld is not required to be admissible in evidence or free from a claim of privilege.