Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2108 House Committee Report / Analysis

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS             C.S.H.B. 2108     By: Paxton     Agriculture & Livestock     Committee Report (Substituted)             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Currently, an owner of certain livestock is required to file brands, earmarks, tattoos, electronic devices, and other types of marks on those animals with the county clerk and to rerecord those marks every 10 years. This manual filing and rerecording process is time-consuming for a county clerk and may require additional labor in some counties. C.S.H.B. 2108 authorizes a county clerk to accept an electronic filing or rerecording of such marks.        RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.       ANALYSIS    C.S.H.B. 2108 amends the Agriculture Code to authorize a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of an earmark, brand, tattoo, electronic device, or other type of mark on cattle, hogs, sheep, or goats for which a recording is required by provisions of law.       EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.       COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE       C.S.H.B. 2108 differs from the original by authorizing a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of certain marks on livestock, whereas the original authorizes a county clerk to accept or require such a filing or rerecording.        

BILL ANALYSIS

# BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

C.S.H.B. 2108
By: Paxton
Agriculture & Livestock
Committee Report (Substituted)

C.S.H.B. 2108

By: Paxton

Agriculture & Livestock

Committee Report (Substituted)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Currently, an owner of certain livestock is required to file brands, earmarks, tattoos, electronic devices, and other types of marks on those animals with the county clerk and to rerecord those marks every 10 years. This manual filing and rerecording process is time-consuming for a county clerk and may require additional labor in some counties. C.S.H.B. 2108 authorizes a county clerk to accept an electronic filing or rerecording of such marks.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS    C.S.H.B. 2108 amends the Agriculture Code to authorize a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of an earmark, brand, tattoo, electronic device, or other type of mark on cattle, hogs, sheep, or goats for which a recording is required by provisions of law.
EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
C.S.H.B. 2108 differs from the original by authorizing a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of certain marks on livestock, whereas the original authorizes a county clerk to accept or require such a filing or rerecording.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

 

Currently, an owner of certain livestock is required to file brands, earmarks, tattoos, electronic devices, and other types of marks on those animals with the county clerk and to rerecord those marks every 10 years. This manual filing and rerecording process is time-consuming for a county clerk and may require additional labor in some counties. C.S.H.B. 2108 authorizes a county clerk to accept an electronic filing or rerecording of such marks. 

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS 

 

C.S.H.B. 2108 amends the Agriculture Code to authorize a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of an earmark, brand, tattoo, electronic device, or other type of mark on cattle, hogs, sheep, or goats for which a recording is required by provisions of law.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE 

 

On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.

 

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE

 

C.S.H.B. 2108 differs from the original by authorizing a county clerk to accept electronic filing or rerecording of certain marks on livestock, whereas the original authorizes a county clerk to accept or require such a filing or rerecording.