Texas House Bill HB2120

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/3/11
• Introduced: 3/3/11
• Voted on by House: 5/15/11
• Refer: 3/8/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 4/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/16/11
• Report Pass: 5/19/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the composition of the board of trustees of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.

Impact

The implications of HB2120 on state laws involve a necessary amendment to Section 825.002 of the Government Code. By clarifying the criteria for board appointments, the bill aims to enhance the governance of the Teacher Retirement System. It is expected that this move will lead to more informed decision-making within the retirement system, as appointees will have a direct connection to the educational workforce and retirement community, thus better representing their interests.

Summary

House Bill 2120 aims to amend the composition of the board of trustees of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. This legislation introduces new guidelines for the appointment of board members, stipulating that nominations should include individuals who are either currently employed by institutions of higher education, public school districts, or retired members receiving benefits from the retirement system. This change seeks to ensure that the board reflects a diverse set of experiences and perspectives relevant to Texas educators and retirees.

Contention

One notable aspect of contention surrounding the bill revolves around the qualifications for the board of trustees. Critics may argue that while the criteria for appointing trustees have been made more inclusive, there are concerns about the potential for partisan appointments to dominate the board. The discussions on HB2120 highlighted the ongoing balance required to maintain integrity and fairness in the governance of the retirement system, as changes could also influence the operational independence of the board. Additionally, stakeholders may raise questions about how these appointed members will influence policy directives related to the management of retirement benefits.