LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 21, 2011 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2159 by Coleman (Relating to the insanity defense in a criminal case.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Texas Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the insanity defense in a criminal case. The proposed amendments would include revising the language of Section 8.01 (a), Texas Penal Code, by providing that an affirmative defense to prosecution exists if, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his or her acts. Under bill provisions, a court would be required to instruct the jury of the consequences to the defendant if a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is returned and by providing the basic form of this instruction. To the extent the bill would amend court procedures relating to insanity defenses, no significant fiscal implication to the court system or the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 21, 2011
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2159 by Coleman (Relating to the insanity defense in a criminal case.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2159 by Coleman (Relating to the insanity defense in a criminal case.), As Introduced
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2159 by Coleman (Relating to the insanity defense in a criminal case.), As Introduced
HB2159 by Coleman (Relating to the insanity defense in a criminal case.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Texas Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the insanity defense in a criminal case. The proposed amendments would include revising the language of Section 8.01 (a), Texas Penal Code, by providing that an affirmative defense to prosecution exists if, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his or her acts. Under bill provisions, a court would be required to instruct the jury of the consequences to the defendant if a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is returned and by providing the basic form of this instruction. To the extent the bill would amend court procedures relating to insanity defenses, no significant fiscal implication to the court system or the state is anticipated. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TB
JOB, ESi, TB