Texas House Bill HB2180

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/3/11
• Refer: 3/8/11

Caption

Relating to the prosecution of the offense of disorderly conduct involving unreasonable noise.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2180 would provide law enforcement with a clearer standard for addressing noise complaints under the disorderly conduct statute. The amendment to the decibel level criterion for what constitutes unreasonable noise is expected to streamline the prosecution process. As a result, local authorities may have a more defined framework to operate within when responding to noise complaints, potentially reducing noise-related disputes and fostering a more peaceful community environment.

Summary

House Bill 2180 seeks to amend the existing Penal Code relating to the prosecution of disorderly conduct specifically concerning unreasonable noise. The bill establishes that any noise exceeding a certain decibel level of 60, after notification from a magistrate or peace officer, is to be considered unreasonable. This legislative change is aimed at addressing issues of noise disturbances in public areas and near residences, thereby enhancing the enforcement capabilities in maintaining public peace and order.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2180 appears to be generally supportive among legislators advocating for public order and community peace. Proponents argue that clearer noise regulation will assist law enforcement in effectively managing noise-related disturbances. However, there may be concerns among some community members about the implications of such regulations on personal freedoms and enforcement practices, particularly regarding the potential for over-policing or infringing on the rights of individuals.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 2180 revolve around how the new decibel level might be enforced and the subjective nature of noise complaints. Critics might argue that the threshold set could lead to arbitrary enforcement, with some voices calling for further specifications to protect individuals from undue penalties. The balance between maintaining order and preserving civil liberties is likely to be a significant topic in discussions and debates surrounding this bill.