Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2196 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 1, 2011      TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2196 by Rodriguez, Eddie (Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Penal Code by providing conditions that must be met for the offense of theft of services regarding the failure to make full payment after receiving notice demanding payment for the service rendered.  The offense of theft of service is currently punishable at various levels, misdemeanor and felony, with the level of punishment increasing in severity based on the dollar amount of the service stolen. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011 and apply to offenses committed on or after that date. Expanding the list of behaviors for which a penalty is applied for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of probation, or longer terms of confinement in county jail, state jail or prison. However, for this analysis, it is assumed implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources of those agencies. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, GG, ADM    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 1, 2011





  TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2196 by Rodriguez, Eddie (Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2196 by Rodriguez, Eddie (Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service.), As Introduced

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2196 by Rodriguez, Eddie (Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service.), As Introduced

HB2196 by Rodriguez, Eddie (Relating to the prosecution of the offense of theft of service.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Penal Code by providing conditions that must be met for the offense of theft of services regarding the failure to make full payment after receiving notice demanding payment for the service rendered.  The offense of theft of service is currently punishable at various levels, misdemeanor and felony, with the level of punishment increasing in severity based on the dollar amount of the service stolen. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011 and apply to offenses committed on or after that date. Expanding the list of behaviors for which a penalty is applied for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of probation, or longer terms of confinement in county jail, state jail or prison. However, for this analysis, it is assumed implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources of those agencies.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, ADM

 JOB, ESi, GG, ADM