LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 10, 2011 TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2220 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the requirement to prepay ad valorem taxes as a prerequisite to determining certain motions or protests and the authority of an appraisal review board to determine compliance with the requirement.), As Introduced The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a savings to the State through the operation of the school funding formula. The bill would amend the Tax Code, with regard to property taxation, to require that a property owner who files a motion under Section 25.25 or files a protest under Section 41.411 must pay the amount of taxes due on the portion of the taxable value of the property that is the subject of the motion or protest and that is not in dispute unless excused from this requirement by the appraisal review board based on an oath of inability to pay. The appraisal review board may dismiss motions or protests based on unexcused non-payment of the proper tax amounts. The bill also would provide that delinquency dates for property taxes are unaffected by pending motions or protests filed under Section 25.25 or Section 41.411, respectively. The delinquency date would apply, however, only to the amount of taxes that are not in dispute. The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a gain to local taxing units and the state. The number of future protests in which the proper amount of taxes would be paid under the bill that otherwise would not have been paid is unknown. Consequently, the fiscal impact on units of local government and the state cannot be estimated. Local Government Impact The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a gain to local taxing units. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JOB, KK, SD, SJS
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 10, 2011
TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2220 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the requirement to prepay ad valorem taxes as a prerequisite to determining certain motions or protests and the authority of an appraisal review board to determine compliance with the requirement.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2220 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the requirement to prepay ad valorem taxes as a prerequisite to determining certain motions or protests and the authority of an appraisal review board to determine compliance with the requirement.), As Introduced
Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2220 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the requirement to prepay ad valorem taxes as a prerequisite to determining certain motions or protests and the authority of an appraisal review board to determine compliance with the requirement.), As Introduced
HB2220 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the requirement to prepay ad valorem taxes as a prerequisite to determining certain motions or protests and the authority of an appraisal review board to determine compliance with the requirement.), As Introduced
The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a savings to the State through the operation of the school funding formula.
The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a savings to the State through the operation of the school funding formula.
The bill would amend the Tax Code, with regard to property taxation, to require that a property owner who files a motion under Section 25.25 or files a protest under Section 41.411 must pay the amount of taxes due on the portion of the taxable value of the property that is the subject of the motion or protest and that is not in dispute unless excused from this requirement by the appraisal review board based on an oath of inability to pay. The appraisal review board may dismiss motions or protests based on unexcused non-payment of the proper tax amounts. The bill also would provide that delinquency dates for property taxes are unaffected by pending motions or protests filed under Section 25.25 or Section 41.411, respectively. The delinquency date would apply, however, only to the amount of taxes that are not in dispute. The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a gain to local taxing units and the state. The number of future protests in which the proper amount of taxes would be paid under the bill that otherwise would not have been paid is unknown. Consequently, the fiscal impact on units of local government and the state cannot be estimated.
The bill would amend the Tax Code, with regard to property taxation, to require that a property owner who files a motion under Section 25.25 or files a protest under Section 41.411 must pay the amount of taxes due on the portion of the taxable value of the property that is the subject of the motion or protest and that is not in dispute unless excused from this requirement by the appraisal review board based on an oath of inability to pay. The appraisal review board may dismiss motions or protests based on unexcused non-payment of the proper tax amounts.
The bill also would provide that delinquency dates for property taxes are unaffected by pending motions or protests filed under Section 25.25 or Section 41.411, respectively. The delinquency date would apply, however, only to the amount of taxes that are not in dispute.
The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a gain to local taxing units and the state. The number of future protests in which the proper amount of taxes would be paid under the bill that otherwise would not have been paid is unknown. Consequently, the fiscal impact on units of local government and the state cannot be estimated.
Local Government Impact
The bill would specify procedures related to payment of taxes and delinquency dates related to motions and protests before an appraisal review board that might bring in more property tax revenue in some situations, creating a gain to local taxing units.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JOB, KK, SD, SJS
JOB, KK, SD, SJS