Texas House Bill HB2345

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Refer: 3/10/11

Caption

Relating to financial assistance for resident undergraduate and graduate students.

Impact

The provisions of HB2345 are expected to have a significant impact on the affordability of higher education for Texas residents. By mandating that any tuition hikes exceeding $46 per semester credit hour be counterbalanced by fee reductions, it seeks to promote transparency and financial predictability for students. This could potentially improve access to education for low-income and middle-class families, thereby encouraging higher enrollment rates in state universities and colleges.

Summary

House Bill 2345 addresses financial assistance for resident undergraduate and graduate students in Texas. The bill specifically modifies provisions within the Education Code concerning the increase in tuition rates and associated student fees, aiming to ensure that any increases in tuition beyond a certain threshold are offset by reductions in required student fees. This legislative initiative is designed to alleviate financial burdens on students while allowing educational institutions some flexibility in managing their fee structures.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment toward HB2345 appears to be supportive among educational advocacy groups and student organizations, who appreciate the bill's intent to protect students from steep tuition increases. However, concerns have been raised by some institutions about the financial implications of mandated fee reductions, with fears that such regulations could limit their ability to adequately fund programs and services critical to student success.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB2345 revolve around the balancing act between increasing financial assistance for students and the operational needs of educational institutions. Critics argue that imposing strict limits on tuition hikes and fee adjustments may hinder the flexibility of universities to adapt their funding strategies to changing educational demands. Proponents, however, contend that the bill is necessary to safeguard student interests and ensure that financial considerations do not become a barrier to education.