Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2422 House Committee Report / Analysis

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS             H.B. 2422     By: Thompson     Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     Committee Report (Unamended)             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Under current law, the clerk of the court is required to mail out a final decree of dissolution of a marriage. Interested parties note, however, that the petitioner in such a suit is more likely to have a current address for the party who waived service of process and that it would save the courts money by requiring the petitioner to mail the decree. The parties assert that legislation is needed to require the petitioner, instead of the clerk of the court, to mail the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service. H.B. 2422 seeks to achieve this goal.       RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.       ANALYSIS    H.B. 2422 amends the Family Code to require the petitioner in a suit for dissolution of a marriage, rather than the clerk of the court, to mail a copy of the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service of process.        EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.        

BILL ANALYSIS

# BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

H.B. 2422
By: Thompson
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
Committee Report (Unamended)

H.B. 2422

By: Thompson

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Unamended)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Under current law, the clerk of the court is required to mail out a final decree of dissolution of a marriage. Interested parties note, however, that the petitioner in such a suit is more likely to have a current address for the party who waived service of process and that it would save the courts money by requiring the petitioner to mail the decree. The parties assert that legislation is needed to require the petitioner, instead of the clerk of the court, to mail the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service. H.B. 2422 seeks to achieve this goal.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS    H.B. 2422 amends the Family Code to require the petitioner in a suit for dissolution of a marriage, rather than the clerk of the court, to mail a copy of the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service of process.
EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

 

Under current law, the clerk of the court is required to mail out a final decree of dissolution of a marriage. Interested parties note, however, that the petitioner in such a suit is more likely to have a current address for the party who waived service of process and that it would save the courts money by requiring the petitioner to mail the decree. The parties assert that legislation is needed to require the petitioner, instead of the clerk of the court, to mail the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service. H.B. 2422 seeks to achieve this goal.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS 

 

H.B. 2422 amends the Family Code to require the petitioner in a suit for dissolution of a marriage, rather than the clerk of the court, to mail a copy of the final decree of dissolution of a marriage to the party who waived service of process. 

 

EFFECTIVE DATE 

 

On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.