Texas House Bill HB2510

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/8/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/29/11
• Voted on by House: 5/12/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/18/11
• Report Pass: 4/27/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 5/12/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to exempting the intrastate manufacture of certain incandescent light bulbs from federal regulation.

Impact

If passed, HB2510 would amend the Business & Commerce Code to define incandescent light bulbs manufactured in Texas and establish them as not subject to federal laws governing interstate commerce. The regulation is vested in Texas, promoting the idea that products manufactured solely within state lines should not fall under federal jurisdiction. This alignment with state sovereignty could lead to increased local production and potentially lower energy costs for consumers who prefer traditional incandescent bulbs.

Summary

House Bill 2510 seeks to exempt the intrastate manufacture of certain incandescent light bulbs from federal regulation, arguing that such regulation is not applicable when the products are exclusively manufactured and sold within Texas. This bill is introduced in the context of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which imposes restrictions on the sale of certain incandescent bulbs starting in 2012. By asserting the state's rights under the Tenth and Ninth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the bill aims to create a legal framework that supports local manufacturing without federal interference.

Contention

The bill has the potential to spark debate regarding the balance of state versus federal powers, especially in the manufacturing sector. Proponents argue that the legislation protects Texas manufacturers from federal overreach and promotes local jobs while allowing consumers to choose their preferred lighting options. In contrast, opponents may express concerns that this could undermine national energy efficiency goals, potentially leading to the proliferation of outdated technologies. The discussion around the bill also touches on broader themes of regulatory authority and consumer rights in a changing energy landscape.