Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2577 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 11, 2011      TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2577 by Miller, Sid (Relating to the unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device; providing a penalty.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device. The provisions of the bill that enhance existing punishment or create new punishment for criminal offenses are the subject of this analysis. Under the provisions of the bill, unlawful use of a criminal instrument would be expanded to include mechanical security device. The bill defines mechanical security device as a device designed or manufactured by a locksmith to perform services for a customer who seeks entry to a structure, motor vehicle, or other property. Under current statute unlawful use of a criminal instrument is punishable at the misdemeanor and felony level. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011 and apply only to an offense committed on or after that date. For this analysis, it is assumed that the number of offenders convicted under this statute would not result in a significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources and services of those agencies. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, GG, LM    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 11, 2011





  TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2577 by Miller, Sid (Relating to the unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device; providing a penalty.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2577 by Miller, Sid (Relating to the unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device; providing a penalty.), As Introduced

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2577 by Miller, Sid (Relating to the unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device; providing a penalty.), As Introduced

HB2577 by Miller, Sid (Relating to the unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device; providing a penalty.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to unlawful use of a criminal instrument or mechanical security device. The provisions of the bill that enhance existing punishment or create new punishment for criminal offenses are the subject of this analysis. Under the provisions of the bill, unlawful use of a criminal instrument would be expanded to include mechanical security device. The bill defines mechanical security device as a device designed or manufactured by a locksmith to perform services for a customer who seeks entry to a structure, motor vehicle, or other property. Under current statute unlawful use of a criminal instrument is punishable at the misdemeanor and felony level. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011 and apply only to an offense committed on or after that date. For this analysis, it is assumed that the number of offenders convicted under this statute would not result in a significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources and services of those agencies.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, LM

 JOB, ESi, GG, LM