Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2813 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 11, 2011      TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2813 by Christian (Relating to requiring the comptroller to provide notice to a person who will be regarded as a retailer or seller for purposes of sales and use tax.), As Introduced   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2813, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($345,500,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 11, 2011





  TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2813 by Christian (Relating to requiring the comptroller to provide notice to a person who will be regarded as a retailer or seller for purposes of sales and use tax.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2813 by Christian (Relating to requiring the comptroller to provide notice to a person who will be regarded as a retailer or seller for purposes of sales and use tax.), As Introduced

 Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means 

 Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2813 by Christian (Relating to requiring the comptroller to provide notice to a person who will be regarded as a retailer or seller for purposes of sales and use tax.), As Introduced

HB2813 by Christian (Relating to requiring the comptroller to provide notice to a person who will be regarded as a retailer or seller for purposes of sales and use tax.), As Introduced

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2813, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($345,500,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2813, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($345,500,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2012 ($146,400,000)   2013 ($199,100,000)   2014 ($229,600,000)   2015 ($258,200,000)   2016 ($289,400,000)    


2012 ($146,400,000)
2013 ($199,100,000)
2014 ($229,600,000)
2015 ($258,200,000)
2016 ($289,400,000)

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Revenue (Loss) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue (Loss) fromCities Probable Revenue (Loss) fromTransit Authorities Probable Revenue (Loss) fromCounties and Special Districts   2012 ($146,400,000) ($28,500,000) ($8,900,000) ($5,000,000)   2013 ($199,100,000) ($38,800,000) ($12,100,000) ($6,800,000)   2014 ($229,600,000) ($44,700,000) ($14,000,000) ($7,800,000)   2015 ($258,200,000) ($50,300,000) ($15,700,000) ($8,800,000)   2016 ($289,400,000) ($56,400,000) ($17,600,000) ($9,900,000)   

  Fiscal Year Probable Revenue (Loss) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue (Loss) fromCities Probable Revenue (Loss) fromTransit Authorities Probable Revenue (Loss) fromCounties and Special Districts   2012 ($146,400,000) ($28,500,000) ($8,900,000) ($5,000,000)   2013 ($199,100,000) ($38,800,000) ($12,100,000) ($6,800,000)   2014 ($229,600,000) ($44,700,000) ($14,000,000) ($7,800,000)   2015 ($258,200,000) ($50,300,000) ($15,700,000) ($8,800,000)   2016 ($289,400,000) ($56,400,000) ($17,600,000) ($9,900,000)  


2012 ($146,400,000) ($28,500,000) ($8,900,000) ($5,000,000)
2013 ($199,100,000) ($38,800,000) ($12,100,000) ($6,800,000)
2014 ($229,600,000) ($44,700,000) ($14,000,000) ($7,800,000)
2015 ($258,200,000) ($50,300,000) ($15,700,000) ($8,800,000)
2016 ($289,400,000) ($56,400,000) ($17,600,000) ($9,900,000)

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend Chapter 151 of the Tax Code, regarding sales and use taxes.  The bill would add new Section 151.024(b) to require the Comptroller's Office to provide at least 90 days notice to a dealer, distributor, supervisor, or employer before a salesman, representative, peddler, or canvasser may be regarded as an agent of the dealer, distributor, supervisor, or employer.  The bill would add new Section 151.024(c) to provide an exception to Section 151.024(b) when a salesman, representative, peddler, or canvasser is the agent in fact of a dealer, distributor, supervisor, or employer.  Agent in fact would occur when the salesman, representative, peddler, or canvasser has been authorized to act on behalf of and to bind a dealer, distributor, supervisor, or employer.  The bill would have immediate effect if it receives the requisite two-thirds votes of each house, otherwise it would take effect September 1, 2011. 

Methodology

The bill would eliminate the ability to back assess for unremitted taxes and penalties after the discovery that a business has nexus with the state via salesmen, representatives, or similar agents.  This ability is a critical tool for tax enforcement.  If businesses without sales tax permits and that employ or contract with salesmen, representatives, or other agents cannot be deemed responsible to collect and remit state taxes until 90 days after their nexus with the state via such agents has been discovered by auditors, the incentive for voluntary compliance with sales tax collection responsibilities by out-of-state businesses will be substantially reduced or eliminated.  Data on the annual voluntary disclosure agreement payments and nexus audit collections from firms whose nexus with the state was discovered through business activity research and who were then assessed for back taxes, as well as data on remittances from permitted out-of-state vendors, were used to estimate the expected decline in annual sales tax collections. 

Local Government Impact

The bill would cause a proportional loss of sales and use tax revenue to local taxing jurisdictions.

Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: JOB, KK, SD

 JOB, KK, SD