Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2814 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 11, 2011      TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2814 by Hochberg (Relating to electronic voter registration.), As Engrossed   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2814, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($140,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 11, 2011





  TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2814 by Hochberg (Relating to electronic voter registration.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2814 by Hochberg (Relating to electronic voter registration.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2814 by Hochberg (Relating to electronic voter registration.), As Engrossed

HB2814 by Hochberg (Relating to electronic voter registration.), As Engrossed

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2814, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($140,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2814, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($140,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2012 ($140,000)   2013 $0   2014 $0   2015 $0   2016 $0    


2012 ($140,000)
2013 $0
2014 $0
2015 $0
2016 $0

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1    2012 ($140,000)   2013 $0   2014 $0   2015 $0   2016 $0   

  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1    2012 ($140,000)   2013 $0   2014 $0   2015 $0   2016 $0  


2012 ($140,000)
2013 $0
2014 $0
2015 $0
2016 $0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would require the Secretary of State (SOS) to implement a program to allow a person who has a valid drivers license or state personal identification card to complete a voter registration application over the Internet from certain websites. The program would also be required to obtain a digital copy of the applicants signature from the Department of Public Safety (DPS). SOS would be required to adopt rules including rules to provide for additional security measures and a description of the offense on the website. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011.

The bill would require the Secretary of State (SOS) to implement a program to allow a person who has a valid drivers license or state personal identification card to complete a voter registration application over the Internet from certain websites. The program would also be required to obtain a digital copy of the applicants signature from the Department of Public Safety (DPS). SOS would be required to adopt rules including rules to provide for additional security measures and a description of the offense on the website. The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011.

Methodology

It is assumed that the fiscal impact of the bill would be approximately $140,000 for contracted programming costs (see Technology section). It is also assumed that there would be postage savings of approximately $0.80 each from people who choose to register online instead of mailing a prepaid postage voter registration application but it is not known how many people who would otherwise utilize prepaid postage applications would choose to register online instead. Therefore savings from reduced postage reimbursements to counties cannot be determined. It is anticipated that any additional costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.

It is assumed that the fiscal impact of the bill would be approximately $140,000 for contracted programming costs (see Technology section). It is also assumed that there would be postage savings of approximately $0.80 each from people who choose to register online instead of mailing a prepaid postage voter registration application but it is not known how many people who would otherwise utilize prepaid postage applications would choose to register online instead. Therefore savings from reduced postage reimbursements to counties cannot be determined. It is anticipated that any additional costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.

Technology

SOS estimates a cost of $20,000 to develop an Internet voter registration application and $120,000 to import, verify, secure, and store the applicants digital signature. In addition, it is assumed that DPS would need to create an interface that would allow for the electronic signatures to be transmitted to SOS but it is assumed this cost could be absorbed within existing resources.

SOS estimates a cost of $20,000 to develop an Internet voter registration application and $120,000 to import, verify, secure, and store the applicants digital signature. In addition, it is assumed that DPS would need to create an interface that would allow for the electronic signatures to be transmitted to SOS but it is assumed this cost could be absorbed within existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, BTA

 JOB, KJG, BTA