LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 20, 2011 TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3071 by Veasey (Relating to contract award considerations by certain conservation and reclamation districts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require certain conservation and reclamation districts to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder or to the bidder who provides the goods or services at the best value for the district. The bill would specify how a district would determine the best value. Passage of the bill is not expected to result in any significant fiscal impact on any state agency. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 580 Water Development Board LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, TL, AH, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 20, 2011
TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3071 by Veasey (Relating to contract award considerations by certain conservation and reclamation districts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3071 by Veasey (Relating to contract award considerations by certain conservation and reclamation districts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3071 by Veasey (Relating to contract award considerations by certain conservation and reclamation districts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB3071 by Veasey (Relating to contract award considerations by certain conservation and reclamation districts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would require certain conservation and reclamation districts to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder or to the bidder who provides the goods or services at the best value for the district. The bill would specify how a district would determine the best value. Passage of the bill is not expected to result in any significant fiscal impact on any state agency.
The bill would require certain conservation and reclamation districts to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder or to the bidder who provides the goods or services at the best value for the district. The bill would specify how a district would determine the best value.
Passage of the bill is not expected to result in any significant fiscal impact on any state agency.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 580 Water Development Board
582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 580 Water Development Board
LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, TL, AH, KKR
JOB, SZ, TL, AH, KKR